• homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wish those movies were still funny today. They were so great in their time.

        They aged terribly

        • FE80@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m so glad someone finally had the bravery and moral courage to take on the scourge of…Austin Powers movies. Truly this is the cause of our time.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Can you share examples?

          I don’t remotely remember the one i saw.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well, just off the top of my head, from very old memories, there’s tons of sexual assault. Also lots of making fun of fat people and people with different bodies in general. I’m sure there’s a lot more.

            • SuperApples@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              There’s also the fact that half the ‘jokes’ were just a scene going on longer than you’d expect.

              I think a lot of the body shaming jokes don’t land not because we are uptight PC wokies, but because when you don’t stigmatise something, it loses its social power. Oh that person has a mole? So what? The boomer humour was ‘oh, it’s bad to have a mole, but you should never say anything about it!’ when you don’t believe either of those statements there is no joke, and the scene goes on for like 5 minutes…

            • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              I wonder what will be considered horrible in 5-10 years from now? What awful thing we are doing now that we are unaware of?

        • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I find the first one aged better than the rest. I still laughed out loud after watching it recently. The later movies, not so much.

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You thought Trump’s weird enthusiasm for the guy couldn’t get weirder. Just wait.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can my city borrow Mamdani for a couple months?

    This guy seems like he’s off to a great start.

    And who would have thought paying people to provide services would work? I’m shocked!

    • homes@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      He’s young enough that, once he’s done in NYC, he could go off and be mayor of several other cities afterward.

        • homes@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The pot hole that Governor Kathy Hochul filled once she was elected to took office was finally issuing cannabis stores and farms licenses to grow and sell two years after weed was legalized in New York State, after Cuomo refused to, that corrupt, ass-grabbing jerk.

          And thank you very much for providing me the incredibly rare opportunity to use that pun. I’ve been sitting on that for so very long.

  • blarghly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, I do legitimately wonder how he did this when other administrations didn’t or couldn’t. Would like an insider perspective. Like, did he just pay tons and tons of OT? Did he order the potholes filled quickly, even if they didn’t meet the normal standard for quality? Did he crack the whip and say “fuck your union rules!” Or were past administrations just this corrupt/lazy/incompetent?

    I’m sure his fanboys will say “obviously it’s the last one - he’s not a corrupt capitalist pig”, or something. And I’m open to that explaination. But I’d like, yaknow, some actual statements from people who were actually involved.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      EDIT 2: See Aatube’s comment below for the NYT article link. It’s real.


      I mean, I do legitimately wonder how he did this when other administrations didn’t or couldn’t.

      I suspect the article is overselling it (the comparison, not the raw pothole number), and they don’t source basically anything they’re saying, so it’s hard to definitively call them on that. NYC had a winter that created an abnormal number of potholes, and this article (using an uncited figure) says: “the same number that would usually take New York’s Department of Transport (DOT) a week.” But is that for filling potholes directly after winter? Is it for the rate of potholes per week averaged across the year (which would be a completely invalid comparison)? I guess I could try digging it up, but Novara Media clearly didn’t give enough of a shit when they said it.

      I think it’s cool regardless.

      Donate one hour’s wage per month—or whatever you can afford—today.

      Dunno, Novara; maybe when you decide to learn how hyperlinks work.


      EDIT: I tried to follow one breadcrumb to the NYT using this quote from the article: “According to the New York Times, the incident signaled early on that Mamdani was raring to take on “long ignored street improvements – the kind of meat-and-potatoes issue that some previous mayors have struggled to deliver on”.”.

      I can’t find that quote, even trying several different verbatim excerpts from the quote (but the full quote should be findable anyway). Thaaaaaaaat’s really fucking questionable. I could be missing something. @return2ozma@lemmy.world, your thoughts?

        • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          2 months ago

          Since Mayor Mamdani took office, NYC DOT has fixed more than 50,000 potholes, with an average response time of around two days. Additional pothole blitzes are planned for later this spring. NYC DOT will resurface 1,150 miles of roadway this year, ensuring our streets remain safe for all New Yorkers.

          Daaaaaamn. That is some actual work being done. And all it took was electing a socialist. Let that be the lesson.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Here’s a press release from the piece of shit who was in office previously, Eric Adams, celebrating the 500,000th filled pothole of his tenure. Mamdani assumed office January 1, so at 82 days, he’s advertising ~610 potholes fixed per day in a winter that’s produced an abnormally high amount of potholes.

            Adams’ press released was published January 29, 2025, and he assumed office January 1, 2022, or 1124 days. This means Adams was advertising ~445 potholes filled per day, which is 73% the amount Mamdani advertises here. Once you account for the fact that Adams’ average was across three years rather than just “from the middle of winter to spring” – meaning that on average there were fewer potholes available to fix per day than Mamdani’s timespan – the difference, while not exactly clear, is negligible. Even accounting for the fact that Mamdani just assumed office and may have some inertia, these aren’t even close to earth-shaking numbers.

            You can also see that this kind of pothole dick-measuring contest is extremely typical for NYC mayors – and god, fuck Eric Adams. If I wouldn’t slobber Adams for basically these same numbers, I’m not going to slobber Mamdani either.


            Edit: Something else I totally forgot to address is response time; per the Adams press release (I’m taking it uncritically, but I’m also taking the Mamdani PR uncritically; sue me):

            New pothole complaints to 311 are closed in an average of approximately 1.8 days — more than a full day faster than the de Blasio administration’s average of 3.4 days and more than twice as fast as Bloomberg administration’s average of 4.4 days.

            Meanwhile, Mamdani’s press release states:

            NYC DOT has fixed more than 50,000 potholes, with an average response time of around two days. [I’ll assume this is response to a 311 complaint.]

            And just like before, the difference in the nature of their tenure means I can’t in good faith give Adams the point based on the raw number; obviously the average response time across three years with four seasons each could have fewer hurdles on average than “middle of winter to spring”, where everything’s cold as fuck and frozen and snowing.

            • Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              I appreciate you sitting through all of this for our benefit :)

              I wanna see mamdani be successful but I’m wary of putting politicians up on a pedestal as our saviors and hope, as I’m learning from my elder leftists that thats gone wrong a lot of times before 😅

              Still rooting for him though :)

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          EDIT: See Aatube’s comment below for the NYT article link. It’s real.


          Okay, makes sense; from the press release:

          “NYC DOT crews stepped up yesterday to fill almost a week’s worth of potholes in a single day,” said NYC DOT Commissioner Flynn. “Now that the streets have thawed from a historic winter, we’ve ramped up our pothole-filling efforts and are beginning to fully repave streets across the five boroughs. This year, we’ll repave more than 1,100 lane miles of streets — the best way to help ensure our streets are safe and smooth for all New Yorkers.”

          Left with no other data (I’m not thrilled Novara treated this press release totally uncritically), I’m forced to assume they mean “average potholes per week per year”, which is a completely bullshit metric to compare against that you’d only use as an empty boast. A day with just under 7x the efficiency of an average day of the year isn’t all that exceptional when the day is a spring thaw right after a winter that made an exceptional amount of potholes. Pothole filling is not and will never be even close to evenly distributed.

          It’s still very good to be taking care of potholes, but Novara seemingly took a standard press release about fixing potholes and turned it into how Mamdani is revolutionizing NYC.


          All that aside: what are your thoughts on the article seemingly fabricating a quote from The New York Times?

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      The question is, how many potholes do they usually fill in a day? For all we know they fill 8000 potholes every spring, but just don’t advertise it. That being said, letting the people know what you do for them is important.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      But I’d like, yaknow, some actual statements from people who were actually involved.

      He said, asking on Lemmy, where none of those people are likely to exist.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure. But a future article or other news source or maybe a former mayor’s aide’s twitter account might have more info, and maybe someone here knows about that

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 months ago

    Of course.

    Actual uplifting news and it’s something Zohran Mamdani did. Sucks that this guy isn’t eligible for the presidency.

      • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 months ago

        …because Zohran Mamdani isnt already the president and isnt being supported by the richest men in the world and is actively being worked against.

  • metakrakalaka@lemmychan.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Great things happen when the wealthy pay their fair share.

    This is exactly why they never want us to see it happen.

  • fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean I know he’s a ladies man, but seriously, 8000 in a day? Hats off, Mamdani. Don’t forget the electrolyte drinks.

    • slowcakes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      2 months ago

      What the fuck is a cis people, we are you so obsessed with people’s sexuality, isn’t people good enough? Why does a certain sexuality have to do that, why can’t anyone?

      • starlinguk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Cis” is not a sexuality. The only person going on about sexuality is youuuuuu.

      • Emma_Gold_Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Cis people are people whose gender identity matches their sex assigned at birth. It’s basically anyone that isn’t transgender, nonbinary, or intersex.

        It matters in this contect because while transgender people can advocate for their own rights, they don’t have the leverage needed to succeed unless cisgender (cis) people help.

      • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s important to remember there is no default or baseline for defining a human person. With race, if someone just says “person” without specifying race/color, does that imply “white” (or whatever other default) to you? And if I just say “people”, does that mean straight people only and not gay people?

        How about gender? Are “people” just the men, or just the women? Cis/trans is the same. There is no default here, just a bunch of people with different backgrounds trying to do their best.

        Also, if it just so happens you’re one of the folks who considers “cis” a slur, I’d ask if you feel the same about the most accurate terms for your gender, race/ethnicity, etc.

  • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Turns out you can improve both public transit and driving! It was sort of being implied by haters that driving was going to get way worse under him IIRC.