• ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Couldn’t help but laugh at the juxtaposition of these soldiers being in full camouflage including face paint, while walking around holding up this giant rainbow-colored obliterator of stealth, lol

      • Emopunker@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Please clarify your comment because with the context it either doesnt make sense or you are confusing transmen with transwomen if you take issue with transpeople in sports.

  • bearboiblake@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    woaw, so inclusive! now LGBTQ+ folk can also proudly die or become traumatized for the benefit of a handful of rich pedophiles! /s

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, I would not be so hasty. The current government is working with the far right, which has heavily critiqued this ad campaign. They have representatives calling flying the pride flag a sign of celebrating pedofiles, and have banned the flag on municipal properies. If their coallition wins this election, the far right will be running this country.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If their coallition wins this election, the far right will be running this country.

      Yes, that is typically how democracy works. The ones that win get to rule until the next election.

      And just to mention, the right leaning coalition is already running the country. And have been doing so for the past ~4 years.

      But yes, Björn Söder (which is the guy being loud about it) is a disgusting human being. And how a party can make the decision to keep such a person is dissapointing and appaling. No disagreement there.

  • Natanael@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Not with our current government. Try South Korea, they defeated their would-be dictator

    • pucker4676@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The new Korea redesigned by the US? I’m not sure you’ll find what you’re looking for in the west.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Right? It’s crazy how people blink straight past how SK politics actually works.

        All six living South Korean ex-presidents have been convicted of crimes following their exit from office.

        Getting one guy is notable. But if you keep putting news crooks in office and letting them fuck shit up for a term or three, the “we’re the country that stopped our dictator!” line runs thin.

        How about stop electing dictators for a few years first, and then we can applaud you.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Hardly imperialistic. Sweden’s stance toward Finland and Norway has always been union rather than protectorate. Sweden did hurt its native population in the North and is still not doing a great job on that front, but imperialism is not the word you’re looking for here.

        • Dewe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yes indeed, they’re part of NATO now, thanks for highlighting that positive development. Any step that can be taken against the russian dictatorship is a good one.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You either don’t know what NATO is, or you don’t know what “imperialism” means.

              • QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Imperialism is the monopoly stage of capitalism defined by the export of finance capital, super-exploitation of subjugated nations, and unequal exchange enforced by state power. NATO was not founded to protect democracy but to secure the geopolitical conditions for Western capital to extract surplus value. The narrative of defending freedom is merely a facade to obscure this class function.

                The alliance institutionalized a transatlantic arms market guaranteeing demand for Western arms manufacturers, facilitating finance capital export while enforcing Euro-American hegemony. It standardizes military procurement to ensure profits flow back to core industries, maintaining the superiority required to enforce unequal exchange rates and resource extraction abroad. This is the material function of the organization beyond the rhetoric.

                History disproves the democratic pretense immediately. Portugal was a founding member while under a fascist dictatorship, using NATO logistics to wage colonial wars in Africa. France and Belgium, also founders, were violently enforcing colonial rule in Algeria and the Congo at the alliance’s formation. NATO coordinated with these regimes to protect imperial property relations, proving it exists to enforce the global hierarchy that makes super-exploitation possible.

              • Saryn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                How dare NATO countries not allow to be invaded?! Don’t they know might is right?

                Wait…

  • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Somehow I highly doubt that denmark Sweden (as any capitalistic country) would not just throw queers under the bus with everyone else if it means securing capitalist interests (which is like the main reason for war)

    • timestatic@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Bro wtf are you on about? Yes Sweden is capitalistic. So what. It can still hold up its values and protect Queer people.

      • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Capitalism has no ethics. If it is more profitable to act like you care about queer people, it will sell itself like it does care, but it will just stop acting like it cares the minute it becomes more profitable to not care.

        I will give you an example. Just remember what pride month looked like 3-4 years ago. Fucking everything was plastered in rainbows. You could not escape it. Now compare this to what pride moth last year looked like.

        I would say, that this gigantic difference in how companys sell themselves is a prime example of my point. Once shit starts to hit the fan and support is needed more than ever capitalism usually just tucks away, because it always follows the path if the least resistance.

        • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Capitalism has ethics. Even if the profit motive were supreme, that would be an ethic. Choosing to be evil is an ethical stance.

          But in practice capitalists are always ready to sacrifice their profits and prosperity to maintain hierarchies, and more specifically white supremacy. Capitalists will pay billions to bail out banks so that the banks maintain their hierarchy over the capital of the petit bourgeoisie.

          Capitalists will pay trillions to fight wars to destroy a nation’s production capacity to prevent them from becoming socialist egalitarian, or to secure control of oil deposits that will produce mere billions in profits to shore up their dominance over the market.

          Capitalists will burn down a low-status corporate department and spend millions on temporary replacements rather than admit their work is necessary. They will work employees to the bone rather than profit off their relaxed creativity.

          Capitalist insurance companies will rather waste billions of dollars on birth complications rather than tell doctors to defer to midwives on birth positions. They will rather be in the lurch for millions of dollars of emergency healthcare for the medically bankrupt than provide preventative care.

          In capitalism, profit is an excuse for exploitation. If you intend to exploit people and you’re upper class, there are always venture capitalists willing to give your idea a try. If you intend to empower people and have scientific studies to prove it’s profitable, then sadly they just need a couple more studies believe you.

          And if you manage to crowdsource the funding to do the profitable empowering thing, inspectors and cops and vandals will come crawling out of the woodwork to tear you down. And if none of that sticks, they will create a competitor to operate at a loss to drive you out of business and restore the capitalist hierarchy.

          • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Theres no difference. The state, which job it is to secure capitalist interests, will follow the same path, which means exerting oppression to divide the proletariat to secure capitalist interest.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is a Swedish armed forces ad, what does Denmark have to do with it other than having been to war with Sweden a lot of times in the distant past?

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      A cow person disliking swedes is a meme that writes itself.

      Swede -> suede -> danish pastry better -> danish

      Can’t be added to make it :(

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      the army would never put gays in front line combat. it’s established army doctrine that they’re too precious.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Försvarsmakten (Swedish Armed Forces) is the umbrella the army, navy, air force, and home guard exist under.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Har sjömän större chans att vara bögar eller? Är jag i fel yrke, månne?

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Forlat, jag pratar inte svenska (this the only thing I remember how to say in Swedish, which is ironic because it’s actually completely useless to use in conversation - every time I said it while I was there, people didn’t know what to say next)

            As the other poster said, it’s just a joke - there’s a stereotype about sailors finding comfort with each other while they’re stuck on a boat in the middle of nowhere.

          • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Har sjömän större chans att vara bögar eller? Är jag i fel yrke, månne?

            It was (is?) a long standing joke or inference that the US Navy attracts gay dudes. I’ve never looked to see where this came from because I never really cared, but it’s there. The joke seems to be dying, thankfully.