• ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not just brands that should fear it, but also people living in cities. Say no to SUVs, even if you “sometimes go to camping, once or twice a year” (yeah, that’s the justification for everyone buying them).

  • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Can we just fucking STOP doing SUVs please? And huge trucks. And all the rest of that oversized garbage.

    • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      But I like being able to see over everyone else

      • everyone

      At this point I’m planning to see under everyone else.

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      But without SUVs, people would be embarrassed driving minivans and without huge trucks, there would be nothing to compensate for small penises.

      • thatOneGuy@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        Bring on an era where minivans are cool again, SUVs are tacky, and hot hatches + coupes reign supreme.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I want a mostly analog microbus body on a kei size frame. Standardized universal plug ins with easily swappable parts. Basically easily accessible media/electronic wiring internally where we can swap the wiring harness, speakers and receiver. A standard sized motor slot for each wheel and same for battery slot and hookups. If new battery technology comes out, they make it to fit the same size slot with adapters pre-fit so no modifications are needed.

          If a motor goes bad set to a temporary mode where all power goes to front or back wheel depending on which died… drive into shop lift car, put on standardized lift… Mechanic knows where full shut off switch is that disconnects battery from all components, lift already grounds frame by setup and pulling the bolts removing the motor and swapping it with a standardized replacement should be able to be done in minutes. The mechanic shouldn’t need to know much at that point, but still good to have someone who does multiple a day than someone who does 1 every 7-10 years.

          Universal light sockets blah blah blah.

          So if you want “smart” features, they are in your chosen swappable part, Bluetooth, wifi, CD, 8-track, whatever, your choice, your slots. Obviously, 8 track might not fit but if everything is standardized, accessory hookups become easy to make

          • thatOneGuy@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            That would be ideal; something of an Open Platform with fully interchangeable parts.

            It’s not quite fully everything we’d want, but that Slate truck that was announced (launched?) last year seems like it’s a step in the right direction.

            The issue at play largely is that customer demand needs to make such options not only viable for manufacturers - but an outright requirement in order for them to remain competitive and relevant.

      • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        nothing to compensate for small penises.

        That’s not true!!! Just about everything that a mid-life crisis covers, can be a compensation for a small penis.

    • stumu415@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Xiaomi first car is an amazing sport sedan: SU7. Followed by my personal favorite, the YU7. Actually the SU7 has been the best selling car in China for a few months.

      The Skynomad, this new SUV, strangely is not marketed as Xiaomi but purely as Skynomad. They have separate stores, whereas the SU7 and YU7 are in the normal Xiaomi stores, between the phones fridges and laptops. Definitely a different target audience so that could be the strategy. It doesn’t have a Xiaomi badge either.

      The same goes for Huawei, who have a whole suit of different models and types of cars. The most insane one, from innovation perspective, is the Maestro, a competitor for Rolls-Royce.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I suspect they wanted a new brand for their non-EVs so it wouldn’t dilute the Xiaomi brand? This one is a plug-in hybrid in reality, though the technical term is EREV as you can’t drive on the petrol engine, it only charges the battery

        • stumu415@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I’m a car nut so yes I’m very aware and knowledgeable. However Lexus is Toyota which is a well established brand for many decades before they branched out. The same with Infinity.

          Xiaomi is just starting out making cars for 3 years now, only have 2 models, and should work on their own brand first, before creating a new brand. The market in China in EV’s is already extremely competitive. So introducing another brand, just is complicated for the consumer. Xiaomi is such an established brand here, keep it under that banner.

          And the Skynomad is nothing special or high end luxury. That was my point. Build your brand first and in due time, create the spinoff if needed. Now in China, everything is accelerated but still.

    • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Most of these these new SUVs aren’t huge SUVs of the 90s - like Ford Explorer. They’re basically the new station wagon but barely larger than a sedan like a Camry.

      • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        A crossover is a station wagon but the entire thing is raised up for no reason. It’s funny how averse the public is to driving a minivan. I drove one as a rental for a week and it was snappy, convenient, comfortable, and could hold a ton of stuff or people.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Minivans’ case isn’t really helped here in Europe by the fact that they’re cheap econoboxes with 2 liter or smaller engines. The Chrysler minivan with its V6 is just about the only exception. And the Mercedes one, but that hasn’t been available in well over a decade. We don’t get the Sienna or the Odyssey for example.

    • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think people who have never driven one or feel uncomfortable getting one and gets one because they feel they’re getting more for their money shouldn’t be driving them at all.

      I think people who want one should rent one that way they have practice and they have to be careful with the vehicle because it’s on loan but the one thing I noticed when just about everyone switched to mini-suv’s and full sized ones and trucks, that there’s more people who have never driven one in their life and it’s noticeable.

      I just don’t want to be hit by someone who has no idea how to manage driving one because of their size and depth perception being thrown off other than that who gives a fuck what people drive. If someone wants to drop money on something stupidly oversized and uses a fuckload of gas, let em.

  • twisted@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    They’ll be banned faster than you can memorize the spelling of Xiaomi. At least in the US, where we make sure the old inefficient companies stay afloat despite their incompetence.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they’re so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition out of the market before charging basically whatever they want.

      I’ve seen Starbucks do the same thing to independent coffee shops.

      Edit: This is a post about real car companies like Nissan, Volvo, Mercedes, Renault, whatever. I don’t care about America. Nobody has for decades.

        • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Both statements can be true at the same time. But the scale of one is many times larger.

          China’s MO from rare earths and magnets to cars to silicon follows the same plan. Take IP, Subsidize the industry, Research, once you have a monopoly use it to squeeze adversaries.

          I will say at least China is willing to kill off underperforming companies.

          The US needs to let a lot of legacy companies that aren’t performing die off. It also needs to break up oligopolies in many industries. Why compete when you can buy up the future competitors and set prices with a handful of competitors. The financialization of our economy is choking us.

          • randompasta@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            4 days ago

            Wrong. US manufacturers have effectively been shut out of China. But not before they made investments that China basically stole.

              • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                I worked in the government for a bit, national park service if it matters, we were only allowed to use US made vehicles.

                Constant recalls, constant breakdowns, overall unreliable. These were all vehicles that were less than 5 years okd

                I have a 2007 toyota today that refuses to die and has barely needed any work. I’ll probably have it at least another 3 to 5 years at this rate

                • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Worked at an oil refinery in the US. All the company cars were Ford. They all had various issues such as lights not working, the reverse beeper not working, constant engine light. We would get a loaner ford to replace our fleet ford and the loaner would fucking die. It would be comical if it wasn’t my safety being jeopardized.

                • cabbage@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  American capitalism has rendered companies incapable of producing anything that’s not crap at a scale because they need to maximise profit at all costs, while quality doesn’t mean shit. Every company is Boeing.

              • randompasta@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Depends on what you mean by American. Most assume you are referring to Ford or GM. But Tesla and Rivian are US made. Many are built in the States by non US companies. BMW, Volvo, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Hyundai, Kia.

                • ms.lane@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Tesla is a toxic brand due to Elon.

                  I love the idea of Rivian but they don’t want to sell in Australia and the R1/R2 have too steep/bulldozer blade of a front to sell in EU (no pedestrian rollup protection)

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              effectively been shut out of China.

              Because Chinese won’t buy massive thirsty trucks. Wtf…Tesla was in China before they even started making EVs.

              • boonhet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                There’s a lot of protectionism going on in China, most western manufacturers aren’t allowed to sell their own cars without a Chinese company owning the majority of the partnership. Most countries don’t really have rules like that, China is kinda unique.

                The Chinese actually LOVE big cars. Every other European manufacturer makes long wheelbase versions of their midrange sedans for China exclusively. Space in the back is a status symbol more than comfort up front apparently. And there are a ton of big Chinese crossovers out now. I won’t call them SUVs because they’re not really off road capable, much like most western “SUVs” aren’t these days.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        And yet even at 2-3x the price, the Chinese EVs provide a better value than the handful of the American options they would compete against.

        This SUV would be competing with the likes of a high end EV option like Lucid or Tesla. The Lucid Gravity starts a around $70k, and the Tesla Model X (now discontinued) was around $92k.

        The Xiaomi SU7 (the car the Ford CEO has driven since 2024, despite being banned in the US) starts at $32k and clearly is targeted to compete the Porsche Taycan at $112k.

        The vehicle in this article has heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats, and over 1,000 miles of range. Functions western companies consider “luxury” are basically just standard in the Chinese market like heated and ventilated seats. They don’t even bother to advertise things like that because it’s a minimum expectation. There are zero western options that come close to something like that. The options available in the US suck, even taking industry subsidies into account.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          heated floors, a projector, a pop-up roof, a fridge, swiveling seats,

          Never have I once thought I needed any of that bullshit.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            3 days ago

            And yet there it is, along with basically every other “luxury” feature western companies save for high end models… all for the price of a base model SUV here.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Those aren’t luxury car features (minus the fridge), those are camper van features lol

              • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                The point is that what western car companies consider “luxury” features they charge extra for, like heated seats and that sort of thing, are basically standard there. So the luxury features they include to separate these models from the pack are these more niche things.

          • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            it seems to want it to be like a compact RV rather than a SUV

            because all of those does sound like something you want in an RV

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I see you forget about the first 3 models that Tesla made that were $70k or higher when they were discontinued, and all launched at $90k+

            • boonhet@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 days ago

              They were only high-end EVs because the EV market was dogshit then. They’ve never competed with high-end cars in general.

              Unfortunately it’s a race to the bottom and high-end cars are doing the same Tesla bullshit of a minimalist interior with a huge display instead of physical buttons with heft like they used to.

      • mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        American car companies (and American built cars) get subsidies from the US, Canada, and Mexico as all three form a single manufacturing chain. They simply have had a different set of priorities that allowed newcomers to eat their lunch, like it happens to any complacent industry.

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state. The reason they’re so cheap is because China bets it can squeeze the competition

        Used to be, to get them going, robotics, innovation and vertical integration is most of the reason now. An example, BYD have their own roro ships and have ordered another 10,

        https://www.whichcar.com.au/news/byd-orders-10-more-car-carriers-export-push-accelerates

        and the new ships will be built in China

        they make their own batteries, electric motors etc and have massive robotic assembly plants.

        To suggest the reason why is because it’s not a level playing field is ludicrous, the US spends many billions subsidizing car manufacturers on top of the billions us consumers spend in subsidizing them. directly.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Chinese cars are heavily subsidized by the state

        Detroit has received $88B in subsidies and loans since 2008. That’s why we have so many cheap EV options?

        • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Heavily subsidized by misery, as well.

          Detroit pays union wages and has to respect worker rights (at the top end of the supply chain). The “communist “ state seems to escape these limited obligations in big parts of their supply chains.

          • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Workers in Detroit might get paid union wages, but many auto factories have relocated to the South where they can underpay and abuse workers much more easily. I just did some quick googling and it seems like being a factory worker in China isn’t bad compared to in the US. They work in highly automated, clean, air-conditioned spaces like would be found here. Dirty conditions and manual labor are no longer compatible with today’s automotive quality requirements. Low level workers make modest wages, but they employ a bunch of engineers and technicians just like here in the US, and they have subsidized cafeterias and some provide housing or stipends for housing. You might criticize the expectation of working significant overtime, but I’ve worked in factories which had mandatory overtime in the US, so that sort of structural coercion isn’t unique to China. Compared to a “right to work” state, Chinese workers have stronger protections from being laid off or fired. The main downside seems to be lax enforcement of safety standards. If the government doesn’t notice something unsafe on its own, there isn’t a Chinese version of dropping a hint to OSHA.

            Now further upstream in the supply chain? No thanks. That’s where you’ll find abysmal working conditions. Just remember there are good reasons our government wants us to believe everything sucks for workers in China.

            • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Oh yes, and even plum union jobs for floor workers in Windsor or Brampton can be kind of shit too, especially in some of the parts factories.

              I expect that from hypercapitalist oligarch-run societies. I don’t expect it from vanguard countries. It’s a betrayal.

      • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Frankly, american cars could use a knockdown. Tesla was our only real hope, and we would have glided into a strong Tesla and EV empire if conservative dems didn’t bail out GM, Chrysler, and Ford. Additionally, Tesla wouldn’t have been in a position to get bought by a dumb nazi.

        I’d say, let their stuff in. Lets get some good cheap and subsidizes vehicles from China on the condition that they don’t raise car prices by more than 2% a year.

        American companies will more than likely fall on their face and hopefully die. Making room for a new american car company to take their place.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      So you think the entire world’s auto manufacturers outside of China are incompetent and inefficient? People always act like the only vehicles sold in the US are domestic brands when they don’t even make up a majority here.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Corrupted by the oil industry and colluding together would be a better term. Someone please stop China, they are destroying the “EVs are luxury vehicles only” gimmick.

      • twisted@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Well I wouldn’t say they’re all incompetent but look at how glacial all the “traditional” car companies have become. These guys are innovating at a speed never seen before while your traditional car manufacturers are stumbling over themselves trying to keep up.

        On the german side, just take a look at BMW and how long it took for them to come up with a competent electric platform. They just got their first car on a good platform (the new X3). Mercedes still doesn’t have a good EV, and neither does Audi. Their etron is outdated.

        Moving to the Japanese brands. I know Toyota isn’t focused on EVs at all and their hybrid is top notch so they’re one of the better ones out there. But no one else is even close. Not in terms of value for money. Not in terms of tech.

        The only ones that get close are Tesla because, like the Chinese, they’re running their car companies like tech companies and not car companies.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          What innovations are lacking specifically? I dont know of any features unique to Chinese brands. It seems more like you think every company should only be selling EVs for dirt cheap prices, but that isn’t realistic becausw those aren’t real prices and EVs aren’t yet practical for everyone which is why they make up such a small percentage of sales here still (though this number climbs with each quarter).

      • doben@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well, in Germany VW (the second largest automobile manufacturer in the world) now is laying off a significant portion of their employees, closing factories and even selling them off to US/Israeli weapons manufacturers. Their head also already signaled VW is being open to switch to weapons manufacturing. Pretty sure other German brands are in similar peril.

        Traditional manufacturers are dead.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          You mean Volks “we don’t even make an effort for our cars to obbey emission rules and instead we cheated” wagen is having trouble staying afloat?!

          I wonder how such a high quality company which was not at all doing funny business and using political connections is having trouble competing with those who just offer better products at lower prices …

          • boonhet@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Volkswagen has made a ton of dumb mistakes, but among the worst are paying union wages and not getting super cheap lithium batteries from being located in a country that has a well integrated supply chain.

            We don’t want to mine or refine lithium as much in the EU because “boohoo muh environment” but really, if we want to compete with China we can’t let the environment be a deciding factor. Mine and refine all the resources we need instead of buying them from China and letting them dictate the prices. China doesn’t give a fuck about small issues standing in its way and neither should we.

            • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              “We can’t let the environment be a deciding factor” is a preposterous take. There’s practically nothing more important that preserving the environment. Even the Chinese are looking beyond their borders for raw materials these days. If it costs more to extract raw materials in a way that doesn’t fuck up the environment, then subsidize it and pay for it. We can fund the subsidies with a carbon tax.

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s not a preposterous take for China. They do whatever it takes to win and it shows. Lower wages, less considerations for the environment, etc.

                Everything we care about has a cost. If we want the cheapest possible EVs, which most people here seem to want, then we need to ignore everything else. So you decide. Do you want super cheap EVs, or do you want good working conditions and limited pollution? And if it’s the latter, tariffs on Chinese EVs make sense because they do not adhere by the same rules.

                • adjectivenoun@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I want the latter, and tariffs are not the only way go about protectionism. There is also subsidization, which is how the US has maintained its defense and agriculture industries. If we want stuff made domestically, we’re going to have to pay for it. Subsidies are generally preferable to tariffs because they can be paid through progressive taxation instead of regressive taxes on consumers.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          They chose to actively ignore EV technology. Despite 80-100 years of manufacturing , they got overtaken by China in just 15 years.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      The thing is, if the American government wants to be protectionist against Chinese cars, IMHO they need to pass legally binding legislation to force US car manufacturers to meet or exceed what the Chinese cars are offering and then directly subsidize the cost of those vehicles to the consumer, freely, with no stipulations. The punishment for failure to meet and exceed those expectations should be bankruptcy through immediate removal of the protectionist mechanisms.

      • mofongo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        They tried when Japanese cars became popular for being efficient, the US car companies preferred to pretty much abandon the rest of the world and keep the government money.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        The US is too busy licking other corps boots. They do not have enough funds to do it for everyone.

        They’d probably need to tax the rich a significant amount of money to do that.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      You mean “their” as in general to the whole Chinese car industry including the shitboxes sold by GM under the Buick brand? Or only Xiaomi cars?

      Because Xiaomi exclusively sells luxury cars, their other “cheaper” model costs $35k, maybe you are confused for another brand?

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yes, I fear those SUVs but not because that one is cheap, for an SUV but because oversized SUVs kill people (at a much higher rate than regular cars, even those with comparable loading volume).

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I always love seeing the headlines that say “west should fear when other countries beat them at their own game”. It’s the same stupid rhetoric that Trump keeps barking about AI and how “we have to beat China”.

    Mate, you all fucking caused everything to happen. Where do you see anything that says “Made in USA” anymore? Not that that would mean much today anyway given the shit quality the US has, but seriously.

    They’re just making up hysteria based on nothing. Nobody wants to fucking go to an office 5 days a week just to do remote meetings. Nobody wants to be dependent on cars for getting around.

    Nobody wants all this forced AI shit in our everyday lives. Just get over it. The endless conquest of world domination held by a handful of influencers is over. The world must change and to start, it must end all of this greedy ass capitalism which only seeks to cause misfortune for the rest of us.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ross Perot warned everyone. They laughed at his ears.

      Yes there were warnings before but his was probably the last chance we had.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sorry, what’s the problem?

        If you can’t reach that resource, it’s your DNS provider being a limp-wristed dick. Change providers.

          • rekabis@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            If this is the biggest shenanigans that the site has gotten into over its entire existence, imma not gonna throw the baby out with the bath water just yet.

            Any site owner has a right to remain anonymous. I would also take serious issue if someone started unmasking a high-profile project that I have taken extreme pains to keep separate from my private/meatworld existence. I would likely not behave as badly, but I would certainly pull out as many stops to make their life as uncomfortable/inconvenient as possible.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    An SUV for that price… In sure Chinese sweatshop factory workers are paid fairly and work in safe conditions and get regular breaks, vacations, aock leave, etc… Right?

    Because if not, you’d be buying products from slavery yet somehow I don’t see that argument very much

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      So, instead of Chinese robot slavery, buy from American or Mexican human slavery?

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        America has UAW, which is about a quarter of the reason American cars are so expensive. They’re paying their factory workers way too much.

    • PoopMonster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not denying sweatshops over there, but it’s highly likely these are mostly built by robots in empty buildings.

      • Mpatch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah. Watched a factory tour and assembly for sany equipment. Excavators and such. There’s people involved. But the facilities are clean automated and far from sweat shop looking. They make damn good equipment. I used to think it’s junk. Then I had to fix a couple. Impressive stuff from those guys.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Auto factories are well known for providing above average working conditions and career paths for their workers in China (high skill, robots). This is one product you would want to buy to support worker rights in China which notoriously have almost no rights or representstion.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not sure. There was a guy on Lemmy saying essentially that the “wages are actually pretty good in auto manufacturing, but of course you have to do 60+ hours a week for them to be good, not be lazy and do 40” from his own experience in China.

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 days ago

      My guess is that these Chinese manufacturers will kill the old automakers that are in rapid decline after decades of low quality products at high prices.

      I don’t know if the Chinese brands have good quality but they’re priced lower than the expensive low quality trash that’s already on the market from all the other automakers.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        4 days ago

        sell cheap to kill competition around the world. leverage new global monopoly for fun and profits later.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 days ago

          This. I’m all for competition and innovation, but this is subsidized by the Chinese government to exploit a lack of manufacturing in other countries.

          If you’ve heard about how food or clothing donations harm local farmers and weavers, same principle. We should be encouraging domestic production around the world, not allowing one country to undercut everyone else.

          • pdxfed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            4 days ago

            China has been playing the long game for 30+ years. When you have actual history and strategy(and unlimited exploitable labor( you’d be amazed what you can accomplish.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            Let me repeat it: China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            And because it doesn’t ever seem to sink in: China is doing exactly what other countries and corporations do to establish and compete in markets.

            Newsflash: Sinophobia is not an economic strategy.

            Edit: "“All for competition and innovation” The United States barred China from buying the latest NVIDIA chips to keep it out of AI. Typical American racist scapegoating.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              This thread is so fucking ignorant and choking on MAGA propaganda. Look this up idiots: the US of A has subsidized Detroit far more than China in the auto industry and BYD was heavily invested by US investors like Warren Buffet.

              Warren Buffet bought 10% of BYD because US options were all losers. From 2008 to 2022 he made $8.75B.

              • boonhet@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                The USA has yet to kill the UAW which they must do to be competitive. It’s not an end-all be-all solution (wages are only like 30% of the cost of a car), but a good start. It also needs an entirely local battery supply chain, buying from China isn’t an option. And they need to pay for every EV that is manufactured, no matter where it’s sold to.

                But the US won’t take it seriously so they’ll never compete for real. Maybe they’ll kill UAW but only to increase shareholder value, not to compete for real.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          They use this same tactic over and over and I find it surprising that more people don’t immediately recognize what they’re doing.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            I guess it’s just more enticing than “maximise profits for the few even if it means the planet dying”. All western auto makers can get squeezed for all I care. I’d buy their products, but they spent a decade sabotaging it and making sure it keeps spewing poison.

            I have no pity for toxic companies that fought tooth and nail against EV development. The tactic works because it’s taking advantage of a broken system.

        • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Don’t worry, I’m sure there’s another bailout and another cash for clunkers with a side of tariffs getting cooked up by some lobbyist to get passed by some paid off politicians. They are already trying to/already have pass(ed) a complete ban on Chinese autos. Knock knock, they are already on both borders.

      • realitista@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well none of this (including the price) would be happening without massive government subsidies so I’m not sure here is the place to take a victory lap for capitalism due to artificially low prices designed to win market share abroad, but okay.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The United States greatly prefers that corporations be in charge of the government to governments being in charge of corporations.

          • doben@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            That‘s a reach, if I ever saw one. China lifted more than 800 million people out of poverty, and in fact eradicated poverty at all. Last I heard, their standard of living just closely missed being in the high income countries category. Their trajectory is in complete contrast to the declining Western empire.

            China is better at capitalism, because it‘s their only play to stay sovereign and overcome this predatory system completely. They have to prove to the capitalist world, that their system and long term development is superior and it‘s only beneficial for the world to follow their transition towards socialism to enable prosperity for all humankind, not just the global north. Not gonna happen under capitalism, especially not under the US or the EU.

            Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

              • doben@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                I try not to let US state department propaganda narratives dictate my perspective on their geopolitical adversaries.

            • mgenehoffman@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              This is just not true for an enormous number of people. The wealth disparity is striking. The ones who are making it are making it, but it is nowhere near everyone.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Disparity is rising in China with the development of the private sector, but it is fundamentally true that the CPC primarily focuses on developing the living conditions for the working classes:

                Essentially, capitalists are winning the most, but the CPC ensures that more than anything the lives of the working classes are focused on. Additionally, as the private sector grows, it gets increasingly controlled and subsumed into the public sector. The privledge capitalists have rest on a dying basis because their purpose is to facilitate development towards higher levels of socialism, through developing the productive forces more rapidly. This is the tradeoff China made, and its working.

    • Asetru@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Nah. It’s just another rug pull in preparation. Undercut prices until the competition breaks, then fuck things up with your monopoly. We’re in the undercutting prices phase, but the Chinese will want to have their fair share of interest on the subsidies they use to do that right now. It’s the same old fucking capitalism again and nothing is saved from it.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah. Companies running on state subsidies competing with others who are not is not capitalism “working”, it’s just another rug pull leaving us all fucked.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I guess in this fantasy scenario of yours, the United States is the one that doesn’t subsidize the auto industry? lol

          • cabbage@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I love how criticizing the Chinese car industry leads people to asssume I love the American one.

            The US hasn’t produced a decent car since the 60s. I don’t even factor them into the calculation.

              • cabbage@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Not to the same degree or in the same way. In the US the name of the game is to have companies run themselves into the ground to line the pockets of CEOs and investors, and then the state bailing them out every time because of jobs and national pride.

                I’m sure there are other systems in place as well, but frankly I don’t care. Teslas are pretty much the only American cars you’ll see in Europe, and they’ve been subsidized by European countries to promote the electronic transition.

                In short, I don’t think about American cars at all.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Everyone said this would happen when Japanese cars started being sold in the US. It never happened.

        Detroit isn’t even trying to compete.

    • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I prefer domestic exploitation to the Chinese.

      If the billionaires raping my life and my country are American, they are welcome. If they are Chinese, then fuck the CCP.

      (do I need /s here?)

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thankfully in the US we won’t get the choice because they’re not allowed to sell here to protect our domestic producers from competition so we can just give them more money the next time they need to be bailed out.

      • boonhet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        They pretty much do the same in China. Tesla I believe is or was the only foreign manufacturer allowed to own their Chinese business. Everyone else had to set up a Chinese subsidiary majority owned by a Chinese automaker.

        Nothing stopping Xiaomi from doing the same with Ford or GM in the US as far as I know?

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          US auto makers have done such things before. For a few years, GM sold the Chevy Luv which was a rebadged Izuzu. Ford has done the same with Volkswagon and others.