• Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    No. It relies on the assumption that newer panels produce more energy hence are more eco friendly.

    Plus: I explicitly mentioned them being a great opportunity for the poor.

    Also Pakistan is rapidly building out solar panels without that.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Depends on how you define eco friendly.

      The old panels already exist so if you can use them without having to transport them across the world (like the parent comment suggests), continuing to use them is eco-friendlier than producing new ones, which requires additional CO2 from manufacturing

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Not doing anything at all has the lowest emissions. But it is obviously not the best way to curb impact while preserving lives and quality of life.

        Your adversity to investments that do pay off would be a great hinderance to society as a whole.

        Solar panels can be recycled, take very little materials and manufacturing and are usually not the limiting factor when it comes to transitioning into a low damage economy.

        Throwing away great amounts of cheap solar power because you would have to lift a finger to achieve it is not… Great.

        • CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Using something that still works as long as it doesn’t produce emissions…. Is actually the single best way to curb impact, yeah.

          Like literally the best use is long-term. If it still works and you can eek some power out of it rather than toss it, there’s no harm doing so.

          Assuming you can recycle it now, you can also recycle it down the line when it genuinely isn’t worth keeping anymore. Until then, if you’ve got space, might as well. Because recycling isn’t free, in energy, emissions, or labor.

          preserving lives and quality of life.

          ROFL what? Continuing to use old panels in addition to new ones harms lives and quality of life? Ridiculous.

        • huppakee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Solar panels can be recycled,

          Most can’t, especially the old ones are glued shut.

          • Gladaed@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            They too can. Their materials value is rather low and the available amount of panels is way too small to make it worthwhile today. That will change in due time.