Yes…because the pasted text has some of the exact patterns that are part of the dataset that the website trained on…because that dataset contains text generated from a dataset containing the exact paragraph…
Sorry for not answering your idiotic question. Also sorry that you’re dead set on deliberately misunderstanding then doubling down on it. Hope it makes you feels smart!
Yes, but if that were true, then every single book ever published would be flagged. The training data is for teaching it patterns, not just cross-referencing.
I’m sorry, what? It’s correctly identified that it’s what, now?
It’s original in the book. What the user entered is an exact copy.
“Original” is not the correct work but you know what I mean.
The little scale thing doesn’t say it is 100% not original, it says it is AI/LLM generated.
Yes…because the pasted text has some of the exact patterns that are part of the dataset that the website trained on…because that dataset contains text generated from a dataset containing the exact paragraph…
I feel like you’re being deliberately obtuse.
I feel like you don’t understand the difference between ‘AI generated’ and ‘something that existed over 200 years ago’.
I feel like you don’t understand that LLMs train on text that existed 200 years ago…
So you confirm that you don’t understand the difference. Ok.
Sorry for not answering your idiotic question. Also sorry that you’re dead set on deliberately misunderstanding then doubling down on it. Hope it makes you feels smart!
the more I hear you talk the less bad I feel about phrasing that so unkindly you really don’t respond to nice critique
I feel like you just aren’t making sense and just need to maybe ask google for how any of this works
Yes, but if that were true, then every single book ever published would be flagged. The training data is for teaching it patterns, not just cross-referencing.