As an antagonist to full time RTO, I delight in bringing my own lunch and eating it in the food court.
Stop eating avocado toast!
Wait, not like that.
The current kleptocrats in charge are murdering the global economy and the neoliberals before them fucked it.
The headline is clearly framed to put the blame on something else, even in a joking manner. That makes the journalist or editor a collaborator.
The article itself is written in that disgusting cutesy style: Your New Lunch Habit Is Hurting the Economy - WSJ https://archive.ph/iwYHZ
I’d sure like to see a list of all those industries frugal people are “killing”.
It’s insane to write about “spending habits” when people have trouble just getting by.
Any article about such topics should blame those who are really responsible: the increasing gap between the rich and the middle class/poor, as well as the politicians who push this even further.
Reporters who blame the people who rely on debt just to get by are lacking empathy and decency.
What does this have to do with age? It’s class war.
The piss poor US income distribution is a massive factor.
When a meal that doesn’t even fill your stomach starts at $20 and there’s a mandatory minimum tip of 30% at the kiosk it’s not awfully enticing. After tax and a drink it’s now $30 for something you could have just made yourself in most circumstances for $5.
How’s your tax (on 20 bucks of food) + drink just 4$?
Depends on the location. Some areas have no sales tax.
This is also happening with reproduction
“Don’t reproduce if you can’t afford it”
But also
“Why are fertility rates falling into the abyss?”
I mean why are birth rates always the highest in the poorest regions? Makes you think that money likely has little to do with reproductive rates, and more along the lines of women gaining education and having access to family planning methods.
Turns out it was the men that wanted the children the whole time. Which definitely tracks with my experience. Men want women to sacrifice for them.
Usually they have lots of kids so they have kids to help with the farm plus most of these countries are very conservative
Poorer regions usually are more conservative too.
Which means that women are more likely to stay at home taking care of the kids. And if they do work, they do so part time. Which still leaves time to take care of the kids.
The regions with low birthrates usually have women working full time. And full time means 8h+.
I bet people would be having more kids if people that can work from home, worked from home. And if full time meant 6h instead of 8h+.
That way, instead of working husband + stay at home mom, we could have commuting parent and WFH parent.
With the added benefit of commuting parent having a shorter commute since there would be a lot less people commuting.
Nordic countries have lower overall working hours, and don’t see increased birthrates. And make higher salaries. It’s almost like when women become educated and have access to family planning methods, they don’t have as many children.
This perception is largely overblown though, there is some difference but the poor in western civilisation still do not produce enough children on average to get to a sustainable population number.
What might be a part of it is that globally the poorest region there is a lot of internal solidarity and community building.
Helping each other out becomes second nature if it means that the neighbourhood will have your back during worst times. Forming the village to raise a child.
Add other factors like normalised child labor and indeed no access to contraception or general healthcare (including normalised child death, my European great grand parents have also mentioned the concept of basically “backup” children and normalised loss of siblings)Some people migrating from such cultures may take some of it with them. People who raised around big families may want to replicate their image of a family but this seems to rapidly decline with each following generation.
The west has a long history of living from exploitation. we build a culture around “civilized /s” families having wealth and became financially competitive. When things go bad there is rarely ever someone to help because either “i don’t have this problem so it must be your own fault” or “no one helped me when i was in that position”
I don’t remember my latest source on this and i spend to long typing this to go look but the statistics i saw that showed that immigration is not the answer to declining population because they don’t produce enough kids either for sustainability was recent data from this year.
money likely has little to do with reproductive rates Or you need to buy yourself a way out of this cycle.
Or its causal and having kids makes you poor.
A lot of what people miss is the importance of safety and security. People don’t have kids when they reach a certain income level. They have kids when they are reasonably confident they can give their children a decent living.
A subsistence farmer in Subsaharan Africa can have a much more secure existence than the working poor of countries like the US. People are poor, but they live on land they own or at least have assured access to through shared community rights. They may not have much money, but they have security. They can have kids, and at the very least, the kids can always take over the farm from their parents. The parents probably want the kids to go get an education and be more successful than themselves, but at the very least, the kids will have no worse a life than the parents do.
Compare that to developed countries. You pay monthly for rent that can skyrocket at any time, paid for with a job that can disappear at any time. And I would say raising kids in a rural African village is probably feels a lot more reasonable than trying to raise kids in a studio apartment built in a car-dependent American suburb.
Dude, that’s a very dumb take…
Only if you confuse security with income.
People have kids when they can reasonably assume that their kids will have the same level of lifestyle they do. People judge wealth relatively. They feel ready to have children when they can provide their children with a similar level of resources and opportunities they had. What barometer do people have other than their own childhood?
That’s not hard to guarantee as a subsistence farmer, as long as they own or otherwise have secure rights to the land. It’s a secure but impoverished existence. Sure you’re not immune from the weather, but that’s true for both parents and children. “Let’s have kids. Sure we don’t live in a big fancy city, but if it’s good enough for us, at worst it can be good enough for them.”
Compare that to wealthy people in developed countries. If you’re a middle class person now and want your kids to have the same lifestyle you do, better be prepared to help them with the down payment on a house.
Might be less that the subsistence farmer is so secure and more that they need the kids as a retirement plan. Most of the countries with falling birthrates have some sort of national pension for old people.
Sure, you could just make some shit up. That also works.
American? Would explain why you haven’t heard of national pensions. Though I thought even Americans had Social Security.
Or you mean the other thing? Dude that’s exactly what we did here 150+ years ago. If you have a bunch of kids, they’ll provide your upkeep in old age. Some will tend to the farm, others may help in other ways (get a job in a city or even abroad, send money back home).
The periphery is of course the past.
Nice analysis. Thank you for posting.
The poorest may reproduce the most because they are going to be poor either way, and they might also not have as much means to avoid it. But it is definitely a consideration for middle class people in developed nations who may have reasonably comfortable lives if they don’t reproduce but will put themselves into hardship if they do.
I think there’s actually a bath tub curve with reproduction.
Also, poorer nations tend to have less protections for children/youth in the labor sector, so having more children can be beneficial in that you can send all of them out to earn money.
Send? Don’t they yearn for the mines?
Note the pattern of how the people at the top of the economy continually blame the people at the bottom of the economy for everything going wrong.
They’re pissed that the have nots aren’t gleefully throwing more money at the haves.
Even if you donated all your money to billionaires and worked unpaid, they’d still demand more. The concept of ‘enough’ doesn’t exist in capitalism.
I mean, how could it? Can you give me the highest number?
Yes, it’s ထ + 1.
And this will be definitely enogh
My lunch from home tastes the way I want it, and it cost less, and it’s better for me…sooo yeah.
I love me some take out, but ever since I bought a massive jug of soy sauce from an Asian grocery store, I’ve been content with making my own stir fry at home. Simple, delicious, and far more affordable.
That was me and spring rolls. I got a good bottle of soy sauce and chili sauce at the Asian market they don’t sell anywhere else in town. I know they aren’t perfect but it saves a lot of money.
it also doesn’t try to shame me into tipping.
That’s only cause the economy isn’t that bad yet.
And most storebought “meals” are either way too small or made for multiple people
I was born a man and identify as a man, but according to Stouffer’s Lasagna, I’m a family of 4.
Similar weight too.
Hey! You’re gonna be in so much trouble once I catch my breath!
Those are ozempic portion sizes
Prices have skyrocketed, quality has tanked.
Sorry, but I have a hard time buying a salad for $10 when I can grab the ingredients for 10 salads for about $5. And they’ll be higher quality. Not browning lettuce with mayo sauce.
Would you like to leave a tip for the service of grabbing your pre-made salad from the refrigerator?
You guys don’t ACTUALLY get asked for tips at stores… Right?
Nowhere that I’ve been, no, but the little POS tablets that small shops and vendors have all ask for a tip by default.
little POS tablets
I choose to believe you abbreviated “piece of shit” there.
Both abbreviations are correct, yeah
Jesus christ. To me thats a “yes”
Not at grocery stores, convenience stores, or places like gas stations. Literally anywhere else that deals with food you’ll get a automatic prompt at the register when you pay asking if you want to tip.
The merch booth at concerts will literally tell you they don’t get paid at all without tips as you’re buying a $50 shirt.
If that ever comes here I am never eating out again.
Though I haven’t eaten out in like 6 months so they wouldn’t care lol
Oh honey, you have no idea the capitalistic depravity we have here
Apparently I really don’t
Sysco also is the food supplier monopoly. When you sign a contract with them you select what products they regularly stock for you to buy, and they heavily discount certain products they want to incentivize you to buy.
It’s why everything tastes the same now and a lot of restaurants do sysco slop bowls.
It’s weird too because there is a burger place down the street from me that literally gets all of their ingredients locally. Buns from a local bakery, beef and potatoes from local farms, etc… A single patty combo with fries/tots and a drink is $13.79. Meanwhile down the street McDonald’s (I know McDonald’s doesn’t use Sysco but it’s the easiest burger comparison) is charging like $12.99 for a Big Mac combo that almost certainly has less beef in it and is nowhere near the same quality on any level in any capacity.
We are reaching a point where corporate overhead is so huge that it might actually bring back small businesses.
Corporate owns everything so, unfortunately no.
Except it won’t. Restaurant prices are rising rapidly, they are failing at an unprecedented rate, and we have more remote workers than ever who aren’t going to go anyways. It’s all f’ed.
At this point, with grocery prices rising, you’d just be paying to have the assured quality from making it yourself.
Seriously, why the fuck does a salad cost as much as a full meal? That’s not an entree, it’s an oversized side dish.
Can be. Rarely is.
Always takes me a second to remember you Americans use entrée to refer to the main dish, lol.
What’s it mean elsewhere?
The word entrée sorta sounds like entry, doesn’t it?
It’s more or less the same as appetizer or starter.
Oh, that’s funny because it’s completely different from what it means here.
I always wondered why it was called an entrée. I guess it’s just an ignorant american bastardization, like half the language is…
I am too poor to eat out. But I would also not eat out if it helps destroy capitalism.








