• Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    As an antagonist to full time RTO, I delight in bringing my own lunch and eating it in the food court.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’d sure like to see a list of all those industries frugal people are “killing”.

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s insane to write about “spending habits” when people have trouble just getting by.

    Any article about such topics should blame those who are really responsible: the increasing gap between the rich and the middle class/poor, as well as the politicians who push this even further.

    Reporters who blame the people who rely on debt just to get by are lacking empathy and decency.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 hours ago

    When a meal that doesn’t even fill your stomach starts at $20 and there’s a mandatory minimum tip of 30% at the kiosk it’s not awfully enticing. After tax and a drink it’s now $30 for something you could have just made yourself in most circumstances for $5.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This is also happening with reproduction

    “Don’t reproduce if you can’t afford it”

    But also

    “Why are fertility rates falling into the abyss?”

    • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I mean why are birth rates always the highest in the poorest regions? Makes you think that money likely has little to do with reproductive rates, and more along the lines of women gaining education and having access to family planning methods.

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Turns out it was the men that wanted the children the whole time. Which definitely tracks with my experience. Men want women to sacrifice for them.

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Usually they have lots of kids so they have kids to help with the farm plus most of these countries are very conservative

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Poorer regions usually are more conservative too.

        Which means that women are more likely to stay at home taking care of the kids. And if they do work, they do so part time. Which still leaves time to take care of the kids.

        The regions with low birthrates usually have women working full time. And full time means 8h+.

        I bet people would be having more kids if people that can work from home, worked from home. And if full time meant 6h instead of 8h+.

        That way, instead of working husband + stay at home mom, we could have commuting parent and WFH parent.

        With the added benefit of commuting parent having a shorter commute since there would be a lot less people commuting.

        • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Nordic countries have lower overall working hours, and don’t see increased birthrates. And make higher salaries. It’s almost like when women become educated and have access to family planning methods, they don’t have as many children.

      • Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        This perception is largely overblown though, there is some difference but the poor in western civilisation still do not produce enough children on average to get to a sustainable population number.

        What might be a part of it is that globally the poorest region there is a lot of internal solidarity and community building.

        Helping each other out becomes second nature if it means that the neighbourhood will have your back during worst times. Forming the village to raise a child.
        Add other factors like normalised child labor and indeed no access to contraception or general healthcare (including normalised child death, my European great grand parents have also mentioned the concept of basically “backup” children and normalised loss of siblings)

        Some people migrating from such cultures may take some of it with them. People who raised around big families may want to replicate their image of a family but this seems to rapidly decline with each following generation.

        The west has a long history of living from exploitation. we build a culture around “civilized /s” families having wealth and became financially competitive. When things go bad there is rarely ever someone to help because either “i don’t have this problem so it must be your own fault” or “no one helped me when i was in that position”

        I don’t remember my latest source on this and i spend to long typing this to go look but the statistics i saw that showed that immigration is not the answer to declining population because they don’t produce enough kids either for sustainability was recent data from this year.

      • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        A lot of what people miss is the importance of safety and security. People don’t have kids when they reach a certain income level. They have kids when they are reasonably confident they can give their children a decent living.

        A subsistence farmer in Subsaharan Africa can have a much more secure existence than the working poor of countries like the US. People are poor, but they live on land they own or at least have assured access to through shared community rights. They may not have much money, but they have security. They can have kids, and at the very least, the kids can always take over the farm from their parents. The parents probably want the kids to go get an education and be more successful than themselves, but at the very least, the kids will have no worse a life than the parents do.

        Compare that to developed countries. You pay monthly for rent that can skyrocket at any time, paid for with a job that can disappear at any time. And I would say raising kids in a rural African village is probably feels a lot more reasonable than trying to raise kids in a studio apartment built in a car-dependent American suburb.

          • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Only if you confuse security with income.

            People have kids when they can reasonably assume that their kids will have the same level of lifestyle they do. People judge wealth relatively. They feel ready to have children when they can provide their children with a similar level of resources and opportunities they had. What barometer do people have other than their own childhood?

            That’s not hard to guarantee as a subsistence farmer, as long as they own or otherwise have secure rights to the land. It’s a secure but impoverished existence. Sure you’re not immune from the weather, but that’s true for both parents and children. “Let’s have kids. Sure we don’t live in a big fancy city, but if it’s good enough for us, at worst it can be good enough for them.”

            Compare that to wealthy people in developed countries. If you’re a middle class person now and want your kids to have the same lifestyle you do, better be prepared to help them with the down payment on a house.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Might be less that the subsistence farmer is so secure and more that they need the kids as a retirement plan. Most of the countries with falling birthrates have some sort of national pension for old people.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              American? Would explain why you haven’t heard of national pensions. Though I thought even Americans had Social Security.

              Or you mean the other thing? Dude that’s exactly what we did here 150+ years ago. If you have a bunch of kids, they’ll provide your upkeep in old age. Some will tend to the farm, others may help in other ways (get a job in a city or even abroad, send money back home).

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        21 hours ago

        The poorest may reproduce the most because they are going to be poor either way, and they might also not have as much means to avoid it. But it is definitely a consideration for middle class people in developed nations who may have reasonably comfortable lives if they don’t reproduce but will put themselves into hardship if they do.

        I think there’s actually a bath tub curve with reproduction.

  • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Note the pattern of how the people at the top of the economy continually blame the people at the bottom of the economy for everything going wrong.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Even if you donated all your money to billionaires and worked unpaid, they’d still demand more. The concept of ‘enough’ doesn’t exist in capitalism.

  • Beth@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    1 day ago

    My lunch from home tastes the way I want it, and it cost less, and it’s better for me…sooo yeah.

  • cogman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Prices have skyrocketed, quality has tanked.

    Sorry, but I have a hard time buying a salad for $10 when I can grab the ingredients for 10 salads for about $5. And they’ll be higher quality. Not browning lettuce with mayo sauce.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Would you like to leave a tip for the service of grabbing your pre-made salad from the refrigerator?

      • 87Six@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        You guys don’t ACTUALLY get asked for tips at stores… Right?

        • Rato@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Nowhere that I’ve been, no, but the little POS tablets that small shops and vendors have all ask for a tip by default.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Not at grocery stores, convenience stores, or places like gas stations. Literally anywhere else that deals with food you’ll get a automatic prompt at the register when you pay asking if you want to tip.

          • architect@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            The merch booth at concerts will literally tell you they don’t get paid at all without tips as you’re buying a $50 shirt.

          • 87Six@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            If that ever comes here I am never eating out again.

            Though I haven’t eaten out in like 6 months so they wouldn’t care lol

    • iocase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sysco also is the food supplier monopoly. When you sign a contract with them you select what products they regularly stock for you to buy, and they heavily discount certain products they want to incentivize you to buy.

      It’s why everything tastes the same now and a lot of restaurants do sysco slop bowls.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        24 hours ago

        It’s weird too because there is a burger place down the street from me that literally gets all of their ingredients locally. Buns from a local bakery, beef and potatoes from local farms, etc… A single patty combo with fries/tots and a drink is $13.79. Meanwhile down the street McDonald’s (I know McDonald’s doesn’t use Sysco but it’s the easiest burger comparison) is charging like $12.99 for a Big Mac combo that almost certainly has less beef in it and is nowhere near the same quality on any level in any capacity.

        We are reaching a point where corporate overhead is so huge that it might actually bring back small businesses.

        • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Except it won’t. Restaurant prices are rising rapidly, they are failing at an unprecedented rate, and we have more remote workers than ever who aren’t going to go anyways. It’s all f’ed.

    • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      At this point, with grocery prices rising, you’d just be paying to have the assured quality from making it yourself.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Seriously, why the fuck does a salad cost as much as a full meal? That’s not an entree, it’s an oversized side dish.