Hello. I am looking for an alternative to Telegram and I prefer an application that uses decentralised servers. My question is: why is the xmpp+omemo protocol not recommended on websites when it is open source and decentralised? The privacyguides.org website does not list xmpp+omemo as a recommended messaging service. Nor does this website include it in its comparison of private messaging services.

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/assets/img/cover/real-time-communication.webp

Why do you think xmpp and its messaging clients such as Conversations, Movim, Gajim, etc. do not appear in these guides?

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because matrix has the bet bridges so I can centralize all other protocols on my matrix server (Continuwuity) and have whatsapp, telegram, Signal all accessible from one single app.

    • u_tamtam@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      All those bridges rely on some community-made libraries developed by few individuals unrelated to Matrix, so, not only there isn’t much Matrix-specific to them, but it’s reproduced for other protocols, JFYI: https://slidge.im/

        • u_tamtam@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          At least you are on the continuwuity side of it, which is much more sane than hosting synapse (but you are missing out on many features I guess. If you get tired of this eventually, give ejabberd a shot, it’s self-contained with all features, including VoIP/AV calls.