• A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Disclaimer: yes, SFOS is made by a (small) for-profit company. Always has been.

    For the parts they have open-sourced, they implementrd a CLA that contributers must sign.

    Just to clarify, this applies only to previously closed core components. Not app developers. But thanks for the info.

    I love the constant comparison to PMOS, which has exactly 0 daily-driveable devices. SFOS has been usable since 2013, and honestly I don’t see a rug-pull coming up. Call me naive.
    It’s a European company btw.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      If you’re comfortable with it being a private company that has proprietary software and utilizes a CLA for its own components, then by all means, use them.

      Personally I’m at a point where I distrust any essential software that isn’t GPL licensed, as that’s the only way to ensure that it’ll always be in the community’s hands. Otherwise, we’re just hedging that Sailfish won’t someday be sold to a larger publicly traded company, who will then utilize the potential lock-in factor that the proprietary parts of Sailfish and the CLA’d components bring.

      PMOS is certainly not in a usable state for the average person yet, which is why I suggest people donate to it so it can become more polished and support more phones.