• bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Okay, can you give me an example of a movement which was completely non-violent, which had no violent sects or threats of violence, which resulted in a long term change?

        • bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I barely know anything about the Polish anti-communist efforts, but I know for a fact that it absolutely did involve violence from both sides. Again, just because one sect is dedicated to non-violence, the larger movement requires the threat of violence to succeed long term.

          Also, you kinda prove the point of this post, the Solidarity movement were dedicated anti-violence, but they were brutally repressed by the regime regardless.