• bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Okay, can you give me an example of a movement which was completely non-violent, which had no violent sects or threats of violence, which resulted in a long term change?

      • bearboiblake@pawb.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I barely know anything about the Polish anti-communist efforts, but I know for a fact that it absolutely did involve violence from both sides. Again, just because one sect is dedicated to non-violence, the larger movement requires the threat of violence to succeed long term.

        Also, you kinda prove the point of this post, the Solidarity movement were dedicated anti-violence, but they were brutally repressed by the regime regardless.