• SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    Wind is too variable. Sun comes up every day, and getting laminar wind is difficult in suburban areas. Expensive and turbines wear and get iced in winter. They can work in rural settings which is why they have been using turbines on farms for over 200 years.

    • zabadoh@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      Depends on geography and climate. Some places in my area are 24/7 windtunnels.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        But you need laminar wind. It suburban areas there is too much turbulence from objects.

        Im not going to make a bunch of links. Just search why home wind sucks.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sun comes up every day

      Sure, technically

      Expensive and turbines wear and get iced in winter

      Where I come from, solar energy doesn’t work in the winter, but wind (large scale) usually does. Output difference of a solar system between winter lowest vs summer highest is ~30x, as we get an average of around 20 hours of sunshine in the entire month of December and it’s not exactly at a great angle for those few hours. Wind would be pretty much the only way one could really stop relying on fossil based energy here. Kinda sucks if they’re not a real option.