• jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 days ago

    Management are assholes and idiots.

    Nothing will get better without demands. People need to organize.

    But if I’ve learned anything from history, it’s that the ownership class would rather murder all of their employees than give a few dollars more a day.

    • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s because the few more dollars per day empowers people not to have to deal with exploitative practices, to be able to save an emergency fund, to be able to look elsewhere for opportunities.

      They had literal segments on Fox where they were complaining that companies couldn’t strong arm people anymore because COVID turned the balance in labor value. Uber is known to give desperation compensation much lower then drivers who are more selective. Data is used to min-max labor exploitation.

  • protist@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    7 days ago

    Here’s the actual study if anyone cares to read it.

    Skimming it, a couple things I noticed: This was a study of over 7,000 people across all departments at a large healthcare system. They found on-site workers skewed younger with shorter tenure and remote workers skewed older with longer tenure.

    One potential pitfall: They didn’t control in any way for department or role, and so floor nurses and housekeeping staff who must work fully on-site are being compared to tenured nurses working utilization review or revenue cycle staff whose job is billing/coding and who don’t have to interact with anyone in their roles. In-person and remote jobs in healthcare tend to be very different jobs. I don’t know how well this study could be generalized to other types of job settings based on this info

    • Sasquatch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      That domain is “Frontiers In”, but it would be so much cooler if it were “Frontier Sin”. I want to stay apprised of all the latest developments in crimes against morality

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Thank you, this was exactly what I was wondering. I’m all for remote work, however it’s not really fair to compare completely different roles.

      Job satisfaction has so many variables, I don’t envy the difficulty of designing an accurate study of this.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    extroverts can’t understand that not everyone is like them. more at 11

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      As an extrovert, please let me work from home. It’ll save me a commute so I can spend more time with people I like

    • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah. COVID lockdown was my golden era.

      I secretly despised people at my company that wanted to demolish remote working completely after COVID on the pretence that people are traumaticed by the solitude and need to get back on the horse 100%.

      Eventually only max. 30% remote was allowed and became company norm.

      Even then some of these pieces of shit actually forbid remote working from their subordinates.

      Those subordinates then gave them absolutely garbage employee reviews and made their worklife hell. Now they are in some other company torturing some other poor souls.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        These are the same people who create useless team building exercises.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        It was everyone’s golden era. And then the owner class pressured the political class to memory hole the period so we forgot all the lessons we learned.

        It’s why we need to bring unions back to forcibly make sure those lessons are applied.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Even if they do understand that, I’m not sure it matters. I’m an introvert so I know how easy it is to think of extroverts as annoying, overbearing sausages. However they have needs just like I do. Isolation genuinely harms them just like over stimulation harms me. I think it brings some realism to this topic if we remember that maybe they aren’t doing everything they’re doing just for the sake of shoving extroversion down your throat: maybe they are just trying to meet their own needs. It’s like the flip side of what introverts always say: don’t take it personally if I need to withdraw from you, I’m just meeting my own needs. Can you make the same allowance for them?

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Sure, but they have the easier solution. They can socialize anywhere. Meanwhile, for us: income isn’t optional.

        To say nothing of the ethics of using a captive audience to meet your ‘needs.’

        • jtrek@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Right? I often like being around people. I don’t want to do it in the fucking office

    • Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Extroverts can’t understand that not everone wants to listen to them yap. Updates at the hour.

  • Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 days ago

    Whether it’s a mix of control or egos, I think it is mostly about the fallacy that they are leaving unspent productivity on the table. Yet, COVID proved that people can be effective at home. It’s nonsense to assume that you won’t do the job and then somehow get paid for it. It’s a strawman.

    That is why, after all logical arguments were made, and bad faith responses dispelled, they chose to say it was about culture. That undefinable metric exist solely in the validation of HR and management. Pizza lunches, recognition events, and captive audiences.

    • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, and…

      those in upper management need us to see them there, in front of us, IN CHARGE.

      That’s all it’s about. They need you to kneel and scrape and fucking bow, and for that, you gotta sit in a car ten hours a week and work in an uncomfortable open-space cubicle where you can hear everything, including Betty from finance chewing.

      All day, every day, so that Brent the VP can feed off your collective energy admiring him like he’s a big shot. That’s why he’s the only asshole who wears a tie to an office of business casual colleagues.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Can confirm. How Money Works talks about it (Here on YouTube) regarding the recent mass layoffs by big tech, first, by pressure through RTO mandates, then blaming layoffs on AI, only they got rid of too many people and their businesses couldn’t run.

        So why did they do it? Vindictiveness. Because of the great resignation during which workers had some negotiating power, and the C-suite resented that and wanted to show everyone who’s boss.

        I’ve been following the trend since the early 2010s when we realized that crunching development teams is useless for meeting deadlines, but dev companies crunch anyway, traumatizing the team.

        I’m pretty sure billionaires aren’t especially bright, rather started with generational wealth and then got richer through luck and ruthlessness, to the point that they only failed upwards. (There are a few exceptions who understand the social contract, but they really are exceptions.)

        And they surround themselves with sycophants so that their psyches are completely comfortable. They stop actually considering data or news that might hurt their feelings, which means they make bad decisions that cost their companies money.

  • EowynCarter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hybrid mode do me well.

    Allows to have the advantages that on site have ( real contact with the collegues ) while allowing to take a breath from transportation.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    “I think flexibility is here to stay,” she said.

    This is the problem with academics. They do a study, find something is logically better, then assume humans will act logically.

    Unfortunately, most CEOs don’t give a shit if their employees are more happy, productive, and less likely to quit if they work remotely. They just want to feel like they have control over people’s lives, which is why we’re seeing more return to office initiatives.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      As the other reader says, the point of studies is to develop objective truth.

      After one generation, this new objective truth starts getting ingrained in people’s minds. That’s usually because after one generation the people who held old beliefs are out of the scene and new young people who believe in obvious things come to be part of the scene.

      That’s how society changes over time. Not people changing their minds, but new people with a different way of seeing the same things.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    Capitalism as we know it, isn’t about effectiveness nor efficiency, it is primarily about power. So long as this remains the case, workers will continue to be abused for the amusement of the higher ups.

  • stumu415@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    If they would get rid of these terrible open plan offices, where people can hear the silent fart you try to squeeze out gently, and go back to offices where you at least would have a smidgen of privacy, this would improve office attendance.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      While some part of me misses my fortress cubicle and undershelf lamp, complete with pillar obstructing the window so I had just two vertical slits…

      I still only did good work there when I was alone in the office, usually before or after most people’s office hours.

      Once enough people showed up it just became a daily social event ritual. This was well before covid.

  • bcgm3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Worked from home for 8 years, and routinely finished projects ahead of schedule which left me with a ton of time to work on furthering my education, personal projects, home maintenance and hobbies. Work life balance!

    Been working an in-person role for 2 years now, have zero time during the day to do anything else, couldn’t do most of those things at the office anyway, and I make no additional money. These last two years have felt like my life has largely been on hold.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’m very fortunate to have a job with a very small company (literally 4 people) where we get to set the rules.

    It is funny to see the ingrained notion we (collective “we”) once had that working from home could never work. I started this job in 2018, and I often suggested we do a work from home day each week since we all had laptops. My bosses (co-owners of this company) always shot it down. “Oh we’d never get any work done!”

    Then, of course, COVID. And while I certainly would rather COVID not have happened, it did convince them that working from actually works. And, of course, they loved it as well. So since 2020 I have not had to go back to the office. We still have office space for some minor things, and once in a blue moon we might gather there. But in six years I’ve probably spent six days in the office.

    Heck, I’m fortunate enough to finally have convinced them we should take Fridays off, too. We piloted that program two years ago over the summer, and it, of course, stuck because everyone likes that—though we actually just take every-other Friday off. But still. Hard to beat.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Bosses are in their 50s, but they came from a giant corporation then decided to make their own business.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Unfortunately no.

        Benefits are actually kinda bad, honestly. We have insurance but insurance companies don’t want to give good insurance to really small businesses like this. No vision or dental.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    They signed a 20-year lease 10 years ago so they feel like they have to use the building.

    Source: wild assumptions, i know nothing about commercial real estate.

    • Brimstone@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s more the canteen and coffee shops onsite I think.

      Our place guarantees minimum revenue to the canteen.

      The company has to pay extra if the staff aren’t there.

      Then there’s all the other businesses in the area. I imagine they come under pressure from local government to bring workers back to save those businesses

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I betcha a nickle that the fines paid to the canteen would be more than offset by the increase in profits due to worker productivity.

        It’s like the time theft myth, the belief that workers will intrinsically slack unless you micromanage them. In fact the opposite is true, when workforces are allowed to chat with loved ones and surf the internet their productivity improves.

        Curiously, when a company mandates that 15-minute breaks are taken and lunch is eaten during lunch break (even when workers are obsessive and want to work through breaks) then their productivity improves even more.

        But the upper management of companies don’t actually want to manage in a way that data shows maximizes profits.

  • underscores@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I worked on site for 4 months before my remote work was approved and it was literally the most unfulfilling life I had

    I would work 9 to 630, come home so tired that all I could do is throw something quick to eat and watch TV (didn’t process what I was watching) then later fall asleep and rinse and repeat

    How anyone is able to do this lifestyle is a testament to humanity’s ability to adapt

    Working culture is fucked up and needs to change

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I was in the same boat for about a year. It was beyond fucked, and now with hindsight my wife and I call that period “the great fog”, because I was so absent even when I was home and “rested”.

      It was like I was living as a ghost, unable to perceive much beyond the feeling of fatigue.

      The assholes at HR were doing everything they could to make the process harder. And even more insulting the company had the entire workforce remote for building maintenance they chose to do on a building they didn’t even own.

      So it’s OK to work from home when the business needs us to do so, but not when our disability needs us to do so? Hypocritical motherfuckers had no line they wouldn’t cross.

      • underscores@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        My company was perfect except for their strict stance on in-office hours (I broke them routinely)

        I recently quit my job and just as of the last few days I finally feel reset, or close to

        mental peace, clear mind, a lot of energy and wit slowly coming back

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I have an unusual situation - immaterial commute, flexible hours - and enjoy working in the office more than working from home. Have done both and working from home is a drag.

    Doesn’t mean I’d force others to come in! But the only thing worse than a meeting is a teams meeting, and there is a lot of value for me getting that space back in my house, and in the incidental learning I both receive and provide to others when we are in person. Also it’s entirely possible I’m too introverted to happily work from home.

    So as long as work provides a common space to work I am happier here. I do think the environment benefits from fewer commuters but I don’t drive to work because it’s so close.

    • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The real problem is usually not the office itself, but the journey there and back.

      • RBWells@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah I am very,very sensitive to commute time, and recognize my situation is uncommon (arranged on purpose though - I won’t take a job far or more than one city bus away) I wonder how the answers would change if the office was in the same building as your apartment, or within a mile as mine is. I really don’t want any part of my home life to be my employment.

        • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I couldn’t agree more: if the commute took less than 20 minutes (on foot or by bike), remote working would probably be rated less favourably.

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Companies with remote work will harvest all the talents from RTO ones, so a difference in productivity and costs (rent) will do the rest.

    RTO will fail

    • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Rto does a great job of scaring off talent that has options.

      You get to keep all the losers who can’t get a better job. You also get to waste a ton of money on rent and office space.

      My company went rto. Then they closed a downtown office and forced everyone out to their exurban campus an hour from the city.

      Anyone with an ounce of talent left. My remaining team is mostly duds. I need to gtfo, but the money is good–which means they are paying (me at least) a high premium.

      Rto is fucking moronic.