grumpy_cat@thelemmy.club to shitposts@piefed.world · 23 days ago📡📡📡thelemmy.clubimagemessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down14
arrow-up144arrow-down1image📡📡📡thelemmy.clubgrumpy_cat@thelemmy.club to shitposts@piefed.world · 23 days agomessage-square8linkfedilink
minus-squarebizarroland@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·23 days agoI think the argument there is that the color was named after the fruit rather than the fruit being named after the color.
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·23 days agoIt fits the constraints as they are given.
minus-squarePhil_in_here@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·23 days agoDoes it though? If the colour was named after the fruit, how could the fruit also be named after the colour?
I think the argument there is that the color was named after the fruit rather than the fruit being named after the color.
It fits the constraints as they are given.
Does it though? If the colour was named after the fruit, how could the fruit also be named after the colour?