You criticize society, yet you live in one.
Paying for the checkmark is out of line though.
You criticize society, yet you live in one.
Paying for the checkmark is out of line though.


A little bit of both. I ran a private wiki for writers to collaborate on for a project. I was doing other tech stuff for the team so it was my job to deal with it. Keeping it updated was a chore and actually using it was finicky.
For example, there was an issue we ran into where we wanted a dynamic table that pulled from other pages. Think of a shopkeeper inventory or something similar where each item was another page. Displaying an item worked fine the first time you pulled it, but if you updated the item’s page it wouldn’t push that to any page it’s displayed on. We ran into issues like this constantly. Some solutions worked, others didn’t.
After a year or so we migrated to something else. It’s free and it’s great that it exists, but it just has a roughness to it that we didn’t have the resources to deal with.


I’ve used mediawiki and I hated maintaining it. Absolutely do not recommend other than as a last resort.


Kek
I wonder if they would use the same argument on a photo of someone receiving gender-affirming care.
I could stomach the ills that come with AI if you could use it (as implemented in all the crap it’s in) without selling your soul to the data harvesters.
Joker gang from Batman Beyond already depicted this.