

Why recommend a license that isn’t OSI approved?


Why recommend a license that isn’t OSI approved?


Unfortunately a large part of marketing is people believing that others do not wish to be informed about such things. They just want to see “number move in good direction.” The stats unfortunately prove that. Most marketing material now is basically lying through omission.


Eh, that may just promote a lot of “What are your opinions about x” posts where the first comment is the ad. Suppose it’s an open call to list alternatives though.


Note: BTRFS defrag will result in a different copy at the end of the day. If you’re using snapshots this will lead to increased utilization.


I’m going to guess it’s because of some linux native things. I remember source engine games used to have issues with non-ext4 filesystems (or maybe it was just workshop stuff as I still have left 4 dead 2 on a separate disk), but I’m pretty sure that’s been fixed.
Been running BTRFS and XFS partitions for years, so it’s certainly a rare issue.
Ah, but raft wars


Out of curiosity, how?
< urls.txt while read -r url; ...
Is a syntax error.
while read -r url < urls.txt; ...
Result in an infinite loop.


You can also avoid cat since you aren’t actually concatenating files (depending on file size this can be much faster):
while read -r url; do echo "download $url"; done < urls.txt
Birds of Prey definitely started some shit online, but it was primarily the already vocal assholes of reddit and x flinging shit at each other. I heard a lot from both sides and ended up avoiding the movie completely.


Legit thought it was just going to be a wall of text editors and nothing else


Ironically, my first instinct to opening that page and seeing it’s unusual layout and density on mobile was to switch to the reader view. Immediately getting hit with the cyphertext output. Cool, I guess.
I suppose I could have phrased that better. The registers themselves correspond to particular applications/stages, but the values store in those registers should change based on how the application/stage was loaded. Switch the order or inject a new binary and the hash from that stage on should change.
Any changes in the boot process should change various PCR registers. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Trusted_Platform_Module#Accessing_PCR_registers


Tmux was purpose built for terminal multiplexing. You can assign session names for organizing and manipulating multiple instances. Send keys to and read output from detached sessions. It’s easy to script.


I’d recommend tmux for that particular use. Screen has a lot of extras that are interesting but don’t really follow the GNU mentality of “do one thing and do it well.”
MIT is perfectly fine. Most people want something more copyleft to avoid corporate bs. I use GPLv3 to make sure my company doesn’t do anything dumb. GPLv2 and MIT are fine if you just want credit.
AGPL is also cool, but I normally see it used in client/server configurations to prevent people from hiding the useful stuff under a different service.
Anything OSI approved will at least protect you from anything. The other licenses I see floating around usually get in trouble for vague language that can be interpreted in unintended ways.
Here’s the big book of licenses if you feel like skimming: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html