• markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Yeah people don’t realize that appliances were a LOT more expensive back then too, especially as a proportion of income. A washer dryer set in 1959 cost $380, at a time when the median household income was only $5,400. That means to buy a washer dryer set, they would have to spend 7% of their pre-tax income. Currently, the cheapest washer dryer set will set you back $1300, and the median household income is $83,000, so it’s about 1.5% of the annual household income. If you’re willing to pay what people were proportionally willing to pay in 1959, you can still buy a washer dryer set that will last a lifetime. Most people just aren’t.

    • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If you’re willing to pay what people were proportionally willing to pay in 1959, you can still buy a washer dryer set that will last a lifetime

      If only that was true. It isn’t.

      The rest is spot on.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Often times, your only option to cater to that is to go after a product targeted for commercial clients instead of consumer. Washer/Dryer targeted at laundromats. Kitchen equipment for restauraunts. The vendors are dealing with clients that are both more demanding, have the resources to get warranty promises fulfilled, and that have much more experience to quickly recognize a vendor faliing them. You don’t need a large business concern’s stuff to break in a year to get them buying again, but if their stuff does tend to break in a year or two your company won’t be considered for future purchases.

        Commercial clients are about the only ones that have a chance of being on equal footing with vendors, the consumer market is so easily snowed by marketing that companies get away with being crap there all the time (worst comes to worst, just pack up your tarnished brand and relaunch with a new, exciting brand, same crap products but consumers will eat it up)

      • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It actually is true. Sure the most expensive Maytag is basically the same as the least expensive one with extra computers on it, but if you look at brands like Speed Queen they’re built to last with simple repairable parts. If you haven’t been to a Laundromat, you’ve probably never heard of them, but they are the Queen of laundromat equipment. Why? Because Laundromats lose money when their shit isn’t working and they need rugged equipment that will work for a long time and that they’re able to do maintenance on. When looking at household goods where it seems like you can’t buy good stuff at any price anymore, look at what the pros are using. They will get what they need and someone will be making it for them.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Don’t just go by the price tag though, because some of the expensive shit is actually cheap but they figured they’d sell more if they give it a premium price (and maybe some chrome-finnished plastic parts to make it look more premium).

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I’m not going by the price tag, I’m going by the fact that Speed Queen is literally the only consumer washing machine brand whose machines you can explicitly use in a commercial setting and it won’t void the warranty, per the bond in the back of the manual.

            What a Speed Queen washer costs now is roughly what a quality Kenmore or Whirlpool washing machine cost in the 1980s, once you adjust for inflation.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              On yeah, that wasn’t meant in response to the Speed Queen recommendation but for the “if you want good, expect to pay more” and just wanted to point out that it doesn’t mean “pay more and you get good”.