Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoputs on witch hat SILENCE, INCEL! FWOOOM!slrpnk.netimagemessage-square181linkfedilinkarrow-up1784arrow-down121
arrow-up1763arrow-down1imageputs on witch hat SILENCE, INCEL! FWOOOM!slrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square181linkfedilink
minus-squareUrist@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22arrow-down3·5 months agoThere is no level of violence unacceptable for self defense against sexual assault. Keep your hands to yourself.
minus-squareminorkeys@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down15·5 months agoDisagree. Lighting someone on fire for the lowest form of sexual assault is not okay.
minus-squareUrist@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down2·5 months agoWe’ll have to agree to disagree then. If you don’t want to catch fire, don’t sexually assault people. Somehow I’ve managed to live nearly 3 decades without sexually assaulting anyone. You can do it too! I believe in you!
minus-squareminorkeys@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·5 months agoNice that you simply assume I sexually assault people. If that’s the kind of thinking you do, I’m not surprised you enjoy violence.
minus-squareNotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 months agoNice that you took a broad statement about sexual assault to be a personal attack directed specifically at yourself. Why would you be so defensive about people saying they like the concept of immolating rapists, even as a joke?
minus-squareminorkeys@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·5 months agoOh look, it’s you again. Go ahead, have your cookie of a last word.
minus-squareNotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-25 months agoAnswer the question, you dodgy cuntchy. Edit: Also, does my mere presence silence you now? That’s fuckin’ awesome!
minus-squareWorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoOk then, you are no longer entitled to self-defence. Too bad I can’t just cast summon groppists on you.
minus-squareminorkeys@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 months agoIf you can’t burn people alive then you can’t have self-defense?
There is no level of violence unacceptable for self defense against sexual assault. Keep your hands to yourself.
Disagree. Lighting someone on fire for the lowest form of sexual assault is not okay.
We’ll have to agree to disagree then. If you don’t want to catch fire, don’t sexually assault people.
Somehow I’ve managed to live nearly 3 decades without sexually assaulting anyone. You can do it too! I believe in you!
Nice that you simply assume I sexually assault people. If that’s the kind of thinking you do, I’m not surprised you enjoy violence.
Nice that you took a broad statement about sexual assault to be a personal attack directed specifically at yourself.
Why would you be so defensive about people saying they like the concept of immolating rapists, even as a joke?
Oh look, it’s you again. Go ahead, have your cookie of a last word.
Answer the question, you dodgy cuntchy.
Edit: Also, does my mere presence silence you now? That’s fuckin’ awesome!
Ok then, you are no longer entitled to self-defence. Too bad I can’t just cast summon groppists on you.
If you can’t burn people alive then you can’t have self-defense?