• theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    your world view is compatible with allowing black women to be raped in a world with chattel slavery because slaves were once though to be property of a white male.

    Imagine thinking you have the moral high ground while trivializing and using the suffering of actual rape victims and slavery by falsely equating it to something as harmless as artificial insemination of livestock. That’s genuinely disgusting. No self awareness? Just none at all? And I’m allegedly the one with an incorrect and morally indefensible world view…

    Do you really think this makes you look good? Get help.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      How do we know that artificial insemination isn’t traumatizing to cows? Where is your evidence of that? You claiming that rape to cows is harmless is trivializing.

      Comparison doesn’t mean perfect equation. Don’t fucking put words in my mouth.

      • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Comparison doesn’t mean perfect equation.

        This doesn’t match with your claims just a few comments ago. So now you’re admitting they aren’t the same? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance It’s okay to feel uncomfortable and conflicted right now. Perhaps dwell on the fact that you actually do understand that they aren’t the same while simultaneously clinging to a world view that requires them to be the same.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Show me where I perfectly equated humans to cows, cows to dogs, or dogs to humans.

          It’s okay to feel uncomfortable and conflicted right now if you can’t find it. Perhaps dwell on the fact that you actually do understand that they are the same IN THE WAYS I DESCRIBED while simultaneously clinging to a world view that requires them to be different.

            • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Cope. You’ve ran out of arguments, but you’re trying to cover your ass to make it look like you’re the one that came out on top.

              Keep up the debate if you’re not uncomfortable with people pointing out the flaws in your world view for all to see.

              • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                You admitted that artificial insemination of livestock is not equivalent to rape. So yes, I did come out on top, as this was the original point that we were debating. If there is something else you’d like to still debate, you can make another point. But my point has been resolved.

                • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Artificial insemination is equivalent to rape though. That’s been my whole argument this entire time.

                  And instead of finding good reasons to refute that, you’re doubling down on straw mans and trying to derail the conversation. You’re sweating that I won’t give up to your bigoted views.