• anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not that my tiny customers have enough of an IT budget to buy their own servers with the recent price hike on memory and ssds.

      • dracc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m of the opposite opinion - would you mind elaborating on how a selfhosted-on-nonowned-hardware setup would work?

        • rollerbang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I believe you, but many people self host on rented hardware for various reasons. For example “proper” self hosting comes with upfront cost. But self hosting ln a VPS comes with reliability, uptime, predictability. But you’re still the master of the software you host, of backups, etc.

          • dracc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            So, running a VM in the cloud is somehow different from “running everything in the cloud”? I’m genuinely confused here, willing to bet I’ve misunderstood something.

            • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s a VM that you set up, you have the image yourself, you could put it on a machine in your living room if you had to.
              “I’m paying for a colocation of a machine I administer” is very different from “I’ve written my application such that it can only run inside an AWS system”