• flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you criticize something because of perceived bloat, maybe don’t make it the mouse in your metaphor.

    And no, it’s a great init system that has all the features one wants. That’s why it ended up taking over: it was the first really good init system that introduced actual dependencies and so on.

    • Magiilaro@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      That is so true. For me, who works as a Systemadministrator, systemd is about the best thing that happened to linux in a long time! It makes my work so much easier

      • Brummbaer@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s what the problem with systemd is. It started out as a “modern” init system but somehow we ended up with some kind of parasitic software heap that tries to replace the userspace.

        I mean the latest addition is some kind of OS installer.

        To quote James T. Kirk: “why does an init system need an OS installer.”

        • Magiilaro@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I fear you missunderstood me: I think systemd with all the integrated features and tools is great, having all the features and tools is such a huge benefit for a professionell sysadmin who has to connect to and administrate lots of customer server every day.

          But that is my opinion, I fully accept that people don’t like systemd and that’s the great thing with Linux: If you don’t like a component then you are free to drop it and use something else. So have fun with your systemd free systems!