• Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    oh wow the third xda post of the year about ntsync. it’s been on since November 2025 btw

          • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The joke:

              oooOOOOOOOOOOO"
             o   ____          :::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::: __|-----|__
             Y_,_|[]| --++++++ |[][][][][][][][]| |[][][][][][][][]| |  [] []  |
            {|_|_|__|;|______|;|________________|;|________________|;|_________|;
             /oo--OO   oo  oo   oo oo      oo oo   oo oo      oo oo   oo     oo
            

            +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I knew the article was going to mention NTSYNC, but is that really it?

    I get that we don’t want the argument for compatibility to effectively allow windows to define what the linux kernel has to looks like, but afaik this is one instance. The headline makes it sound like a systemic issue.