Huh? You sure you got the time line right? Because I’m commenting about the “carnist intellectuals ITT” after they already went off with the standardized DIN-ISO-VegAn-Jokes A1-A4

The sherpas don’t have that much choice what with needing money to survive and the nepalese economy being what it is.

I have never had a babyeater not immediately start crying about “the nasty vegans who will never convert anyone with this kind of language 😭😭😭” when there was a clapback. You lot act like we can’t take shitposting but you just rehash the same 3 jokes or so and whine about obnoxious, judgemental vegans the moment the teenciest bit of fire returned. Must be all that cowmom milk that got you acting like babies 🤷

Kindest carnist

So you’re saying the ones who call nonchristians “sinners” are correct?

Huh? What vegan is causing everyone here to act like a stereotype? The one who climbed everest, or one of the vegans who started commenting after all these carnists had made all the canon jokes already

Unironically the most respectful carnist I’ve met

I should note, although it’s not directly relevant to your point, that “people who eat vegetables (instead of meat)” are also called vegetarian. The precise degree to which oppression of animals is tolerable was a contencious debate among vegetarians, which led to the creation of “The Vegan Society” to rally those that argued for “no oppression at all”. So even though dairy and egg farming require animal murder (to deal with the newborns considered a “byproduct”) vegetarians don’t object to those.

Vegans however take the idea that animals are thinking, feeling creatures to its logical conclusion and will argue for no animal products anywhere. No leather, no beeswax, no brushes with animal hair, no trips to the zoo, no pets and so on. It’s very much not just the diet, although that is of course a huge part of it.

weirdly defensive too, your conscience nagging again bud 🤔

Don’t have to really, our existence is already deeply upsetting lol. But even if, how are you going to change society if you keep it to yourself

The point behind not using “nonvegan” is that it frames carnists as "the normal"s and the “vegans” as the one who have “something special” going on. This is true with celiac and nonceliac, lactose intolerant and not lactose intolerant. But we argue that veganism, i.e. not killing if unnecessary, is the normal thing to do. That the only reason it doesn’t seem that way is because it got normalized through repetition and how widespread it is.

Nobody is asking to stop the torture of dairy cows &c. other than vegans either so I don’t understand why you think the point in your edit matters.The point in demonstrating for societal change is precisely doing stuff others aren’t asking for.

I mean in the same way as “terf” I guess

Carnist is a description of someone who has a meat-inclusive diet, other descriptions of people by what they can or cannot eat are e.g. vegan, lactose intolerant, celiac… It’s not a “name” you call someone, it’s a description of someone using a certain aspect of them relevant to the discussion.

A “name”, as in, something used to insult would be e.g. corpsemuncher, bloodmouth, cheesebreth &c.

Huh? What would you call someone who cares about animal exploitation, and what should we call those that don’t?

Right I went with the most charitable reading.

lol stupid vegan dies because we were right about veganism causing malnutrition get owned

is of course the interpretation that seems the most obvious

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here, you don’t want me to take this “so serious” everyone here is just pretending to be a stereotypical carnist? I’m not surprised at all, why would I be, it’s like this every time a vegan is mentioned.

bro vegans are so dumb they’re depriving themselves of key nutrients and become weak and constantly tired.

that’s wrong, let me prove it to you by climbing the fucking everest

bro vegans are so annoying and why won’t they shut the fuck up about it

the carnist intellectuals have come out in force I see

my brother in christ who is “everyone”? It’s just you and me in a comment chain so deep that the left side is about to wrap around the rainbow for a second time.

I have not accused you of bigotry, certainly not for disagreeing with me. I can only repeat: I have only condemned the vile transphobes Matt Stone and Trey Parker. And I think I made the reason for why I think this plain.

Youre jumping at ghosts, maybe a breath of cold air would help? Calm down, come back and please tell me what south park jokes portraying the ridiculousness of political correctness you meant 😭

Is “running cover for” not an idiom for “defending”?? Is that not what you were doing with

Ignoring the ridiculousness of the politically correct wouldn’t have kept the republicans from winning.

as a reply to someone saying “fuck those assholes and their edgy 4chan humor”?? I feel like I’ve taken crazy pills,

Please in plain english, was that not a defense of south park and their humor? To which jokes of theirs about “political correctness” where you referring???

I am genuinely completely lost, did you maybe post an answer meant for someone else somewhere up in the thread and we have been talking about two completely different things?

What verdict??? What’s going on? You talked about some anti-“political correctness” jokes, these are the ones most would think about. Which ones did you mean?