A bit besides the point, but it is pretty crazy to me that we’re moving towards a world where if you create by yourself, you’re outcompeted, but if you use AI like everyone else, you own nothing.

I’d argue that it is wildly different to vide coding.

I’ll stay sceptical until there is court cases supporting this logic as a precedent.

I’d argue that this is a different scenario, as AI is a tool, not a being. At least at this point.

A complex tool, but really just a tool. Without the human input, it can’t do shit.

That sounds like complete bullshit to me. Even if the logic is sound, which I seriously doubt, if you use someone’s code and you claim their license isn’t valid because some part of the codebase is AI generated, I’m pretty sure you’ll have to prove that. Good luck.

There is many languages that you can build anything with… Although I’ll agree the front end side is more tedious