fushuan

I mean I loved that twitter dude that shopped people’s requests intentionally wrong with incredible skill. There it was obvious given the context, and what they shopped was incredibly funny given the requests.

If the photo is real, someone doing this is ridiculous, the effort is commendable and the comparison to a normal person is so stark that it’s funny. If the photo isn’t real, no one did this, there’s no comparison to the normal person because there’s no one actually doing it, and I feel robbed of that funny feeling I should feel if it were real. Thus, learning that some funny picture isn’t real infuriates me.

It isn’t the image that’s funny, it’s the reality the one on the picture or the ones taking it are trying to convey with their work. In an AI image, that’s robbed. Mind you, a Photoshopped image where the ship is done secretively, not in a clearly conveyed joke or obvious shop, is also infuriating.

If they don’t use it as a noun it doesn’t work, that’s why. “Other women” cows aren’t women, they are cows or bulls. Female cows, implied, but also the you can’t say “other”, we aren’t cows. If they want to equate women and cows they kiiiinda need to use the bad term I guess? Regardless of your feelings with what they are saying.

No because best implies it’s good. Least bad doesn’t transmit the same message as best.