

Maybe but it’s like crack for CEOs


Maybe but it’s like crack for CEOs


Yeah it’s basically the enshitification model
Thank you for my new knowledge.
I actually unfamiliar with that trope


But you are tying that toothless and abstract observation to a quite specific circumstance; a situation that very much was about genocide - something you are studiously avoiding hearing from pretty much this entire thread. This is the first time you have even explicitly disagreed that it was about genocide in our exchange.
It seems like lots of people are trying to tell you that what would have been sufficient for many, many, many voters was turning our country away from the moral stain of genocide - something which, by the way, is not a political position. It is a moral one. So to the extent that you’ve articulated how this wasn’t mostly about genocide, your refutation has been ‘nuh uh’.
Not compelling.


You haven’t disagreed with my view, you’ve evaded it and repeated yours.
Maybe you should address the genocide because your use of ‘left’ in your incisive critique otherwise persistently nonsensical. I’ve done my best to assume earnest intent from you, but I have hit the limits of my tolerance for non-response responses.
Enjoy your day.


You are.
You have essentially repeated the same basic observation regardless of what I have said to you. It isn’t a point, it’s an observation whose implied point you almost seem to not want to own up to because you are beginning to realize how shallow it is:
Opposing genocide = far left
You repeated the same observation instead of engaging with what my first comment was saying, so the above is still all I really have from you, because of the context in which you made your otherwise completely unrelated observation.


Sure but what is your point?


I think it’s quite possible your point is true, but making it in response to this image is implying something very reductive about how a lot of the left feel about her and why.
Opposing genocide isn’t a purity test or a shibboleth. It is table stakes.
Best wishes to Kamala, but all that’s happening is she is seeing all the voters who probably would have turned out for her if she’d actually represented their views - and they sure ain’t all of them socialist.
So in a vacuum, your comment is quite fair and I think I agree. In the context of this thread, however, it just seems like you’re afraid of nuance.
This obedient little slut has them on by default.
Even the YT autogenerated ones when I’m feeling extra nasty.


I totally understand. Nice work on those words, especially if you’re on your phone.
I don’t mind them taking a break, it’s the pretense that bothers me.
Taking a planned break is fine. They could do it halfway through. Hell they can pee whenever they want
I’ve been to more rock shows than I can count, of all sizes, since I was a kid.
Wanna know what I hate, even from my favorite band? Encores. Just make the set the appropriate length and let’s not play games.
This is how I wish everyone would talk to me.
Hats that go hard
Almost seems backwards. If you’re spending that much time in close proximity to a person and you are finding them attractive, that would seem to be a good sign.
It’s what I think of when I see Protein crammed into every junk food and drink.
Jeeves would never betray us like this.
Except the very worst perverts.