Melllvar

There’s no plausible deniability with oil down the drain. The landlord would just bill you for the damage.

This looks uncomfortable and humiliating. Now if they were to make it in the form of a suppository…

I’d rather be guilty of that than of being the ones who rejected them.

Probably not criminal trespassing, since they are the owner of the property. It may fall under tenant harassment, unauthorized entry, constructive eviction, or other laws that pertain specifically to landlord/tenant relations.

Check to see if there are any local tenant’s rights or advocacy groups in your area that offer free legal consultations. They’d be able to advise you on the local tenant’s rights laws and whether they apply to your situation.

!shittymoviedetails@lemmy.world

What are you suggesting should have been done here?

“Pissing in the soup” doesn’t really work here unless you’re adulterating the software with something malicious.

Did what? Did what??

To be fair, there are important differences between open source and closed source software.

Ironically, billionaires probably do worry about money a lot. Just not in the same way everyone else does.

For one, the shark is not at fault. The swimmer is. Which doesn’t really fit the overall message.

Reminds me of the old trick on HTML forms where you use CSS to make one of the form fields invisible to humans and reject any submission that filled in that field.

Information superhighway

I sold gmail invitations on ebay.

Man it sure is crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide.

What, am I meeting the Pope or something?