Didn’t the courts already decide that it’s fair game to train models on any data as long as the data wasn’t obtained illegally?

That, or use a chromium fork that ignores manifest v3 and supports manifest v2.

The title is missing a significant keyword here: “construction”

A more accurate headline:

Meta data center construction allegedly muddies Georgia town’s drinking water, investigation underway — EPA promises immediate investigation after congresswoman brings dirty jars of water to hearing

This isn’t exclusive to datacenters, any sort of large construction projects should be under the microscope right now. If there are legal loopholes allowing water supplies to be contaminated, that should be addressed. Meta and any other companies responsible for this should be billed the costs for cleaning up or for funding additional water treatment solutions to make up for this.

Misleading title. This isn’t an “AI Company”. As far as I can tell, it’s some scammer that used AI Tools to create similar music and then copyright strike the original artist to steal their revenue.

The major issue here is how YouTube handles these claims. From the article:

YouTube’s dispute process places enormous trust in whoever files the claim, with little built-in protection for independent artists who lack legal resources.

This isn’t something new and was already being done before AI tools were available.