It’s not. They may have the same goals but one side is MUCH FASTER … I suppose the main question is “are you an accelerationist?” Or would you rather bad things happen more slowly and infrequently?

When you invest money back in the company that’s either R&D or capital expenditure, both are tax deductible and don’t count as profit.

Eradicating poverty is the thing to aim for, but … reducing the wealth of the wealthiest people …will not move the needle toward that goal, at all.

I’m BARELY paraphrasing you. My exaggerations of your statements are so slight they’re nearly direct quotes.

You speak like an LLM that was asked to respond as Friedrich Hayek fighting to defend the free market against socialism: convincing and yet devastatingly incorrect.

I feel like I’m listening to Margaret Thatcher explain trickle down economics…

More billionaires means better standard of living for everyone! Stop hating the rich! Redistributing their wealth will make us worse off! [citation required]