Yes the charges are related to the way he slaughter the animals. Because the neighbors were taking photos of the beautiful peacocks this guy decided to brutally kill the peacocks and eat them to spite the neighbor.

Well that is what I read in a comment somewhere.

Eat a book lol

Eat a book.

Read a book.

You are so basic and angry. Have some substance I can reply to. Indicate being informed can actually change your attitude like I have requested so I have a reason to prove to you the foundation of all this is based on early observations of the neuron. It takes two minutes on google, two minutes you won’t bother to do yourself instead you take the time to find gifs to express your feelings. You aren’t owed genuine interaction when from the start you have been disingenuous. You sad, angry little man (shark?)

The guy who is not mad with his manic posting and ism slurs. Okay calm fella


No need for the ableism

No no I took up the mantle, but you took the trouble to copy and paste and didn’t realize we are different people. And you are an insufferable idiot.

That is not me you insufferable idiot.

Oh well in that case, me. ahahahhaha wtf dumbass want to word that better

You are trying to get me to give you sources of the semantics of the term AI. That is literally what you are doing.

I think I realized your problem, what you need is the definition of the individual parts so you can grasp the concept “AI” semantically.

adjective: artificial

1. made or produced by human beings rather than occurring naturally, especially as a copy of something natural.  "her skin glowed in the artificial light"

noun: intelligence

1. the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills. "an eminent man of great intelligence"

AI by definition can be really mundane and limited it doesn’t have to satisfy your idea of it you got in your head from movies and tv.

I thought you were angry because you were dumb, but you are dumb because you are angry. (reply to the other comment dont tree this shit lol)

So wait this whole time you are just mad about semantics?

JFC dude you want scientific explanations for why we used words where shut the actual fuck up lol

Again, if you could articulate how knowing the names of the people who developed this stuff is going to change anything about what you are doing here I would be happy to google a history lesson for you.

E: See it from my perspective. You are not angry because of anything that I can change, you are just angry. So how could proving anything to you change why you are angry? That’s the game you are playing. And I am here to play with you.

Where did anyone from the Dartmouth folks identify “AI” as “anything that runs on a “neural network””?

Edit: Also, I asked two very simple questions. Your response already tells me everything I need to know.

Edit II: What fucking “game” was I playing by asking you to verify your claims?

Lol dude like I said, knowing who wouldn’t change what you are doing.

You are an idiot I am not playing your game I’ll just call you out on being an idiot. If you came across as genuine I would give you a history lesson but you are just an asshole looking to pick a fight. If you could articulate how exactly knowing of John McCarthy and countless others and their contributions would change anything about what you are doing I would be happy to google that for you.

People who know what they are talking about. But that doesn’t matter to you, does it?