I have posted multiple references on the use of AI in oncology; you make unsupported claims. ‘Plenty of researchers…’. Why not just say ‘some people say’.

Thanks. I’m done.

Right. The NIH: National Cancer Institute is nothing but hype now. You need to expand your sources past Instagram.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304383526002569

“AI-powered platforms are now accelerating molecular subtyping, refining risk stratification, and supporting individualized therapeutic recommendations by jointly modeling imaging, tissue architecture, and molecular landscapes. Moreover, emerging virtual cell and mechanistic foundation frameworks introduce a new computational paradigm for simulating cellular responses and drug-tumor interactions, offering predictive insights for treatment design and drug discovery.”

I’ve already provided two references. Please feel free to post the link supporting that AI has no influence in medicine.

This is one article. Are you actually interested in learning about the benefit of AI in cancer research? I could post a dozen articles, but would it make a difference to you? Also keep in mind it’s only going to get better as the models improve. I suspect your position is more ideological rather than rational.

https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cncr.70050

You could have done a quick google search as easily as myself.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-026-01276-6

AI is a game changer in oncology.

AI has accelerated cancer research, able to cross reference thousands of studies. LLM’s still suck at writing emails though.

That’s more of a management issue rather than an AI issue. When any technology or process improvement is introduced, it is key to be able to measure it so the company can know their roi.

This is consistent with how most people have technology since the PC. They want control of their devices, the ability to use open source software, self host the services they deem critical. I’m no predictor, but I can see AI going the same path as other technologies, and we will get to a more user controlled environment.

Thinking fast and slow - Daniel Kahneman

Not that different than now. Are people pushing back against AI when it’s used to accelerate cancer research data? The pushback is when people think it’s being used against them, just like the printing press.

Do you think AI is going to go away? History repeats itself, the Luddites will not win. The people who can best exploit AI will be ahead of those who cannot.

People also smashed printing presses when they first arrived.

https://bigthink.com/the-past/printing-press-ai/

A survey conducted by a software company called Cloudbees. First I’ve heard of them.

I had my first real encounter with Gemini while using Android Auto. In my experience, it’s a great improvement over Google Assistant. GA couldn’t tell me what the temperature was a year ago on this day. Gemini handles this and complex questions easily.

That is certainly a valid take on it. The more I look at it, I’m thinking Plex doesn’t want to sell lifetime memberships any more. Far better to have a perpetual cash flow.

Sounds like they don’t want to sell lifetime memberships.