

You are right. I mean a crew. You are also right, sometimes every job needs the people responsible for the work to stop and think.
This is not what the op was describing. They were describing a desire to actively avoid work that contributed to the whole, not because they had to have that time they would lose to do their job right, but because it was “extra” work. The point was “extra” isn’t always “extra”; you are being paid to be at work for x hours, you should be working. Sometimes working = thinking, but that wasn’t the story.
If I hired a crew, and Joe was sitting around with his thumb up his butt, and ducked out of the extra work his leads gave him, I suspect I would never have to say anything, because Joe probably wouldn’t have his job long enough for me to talk to the foreman.
The point was to encourage op to look at what they were doing from a different perspective that puts them in the position of having to see resources being wasted, and how it is impactful to the end result. It is good to consider things from multiple angles, so your choices are informed.

The other day, the dumpster fire got his geography and international knowledge confused, calling Iran the 'islamic Republic of Japan. I believe as he was discussing the violating of the ceasefire the other day, but I could be getting my international incidents confused, there have been so many lately.