• SwooshBakery624 [they/them]@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s an optional field in the userdb JSON object. It’s not a policy engine, not an API for apps. We just define the field, so that it’s standardized iff people want to store the date there, but it’s entirely optional.

    Hence, please move your discussion elsewhere, you are misunderstanding what systemd does here. It enforces zero policy, it leaves that up for other parts of the system.

    And sorry, I am really not interested in these discussions here. it’s not the right place for this, and please don’t bring it here. Thank you.

    https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/41179#issuecomment-4090834541

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      I think the response given is unwarranted. Sure lots of heated discussion in other places but this was a PR, and a well presented one too.

    • org@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This data should not be on the system level at all. What’s next, gender? Race? We all know why this was done, and doing it was shameful.

  • Kevin@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That PR seems to have been closed rather than merged though, I don’t think it has reverted the change yet