• fx242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      Maybe you’re right, but I remember than in the 2000s I’ve had identical cpu heatsinks in both copper/aluminum versions, and the aluminum one had better performance. And then they started to make hybrid ones, stating that the copper part was to allow rapid heat transference and the aluminum parts to improve dissipation. But maybe it was all marketing.

      • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Aluminium is significantly cheaper, that’s why they make coolers with a copper base and alu fins. It’s a good compromise.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          I just thought of another reason for using Al this way.
          Since the heat is being transferred to air, which would be much slower than the 2, using larger fins with lesser thermal conductivity might be more desirable than smaller fins with higher conductivity.
          This would also be accompanied with other design changes like greater fin-fin gap, which is better for use with lower pressure fans.
          So overall cheaper design and lesser noise.


          Of course one could still use Copper fins with the same design for marginal performance increase, at the cost of more weight.