[H]owever much all this soothes my vanity, and however much I appreciate being vice-president of Mensa, an organization which bases admission to its membership on IQ, I must, in all honesty, maintain that it means nothing.
What, after all, does such an intelligence test measure but those skills that are associated with intelligence by the individuals designing the test? And those individuals are subject to the cultural pressures and prejudices that force a subjective definition of intelligence.
[…]
The whole thing is a self-perpetuating device. Men in intellectual control of a dominating section of society define themselves as intelligent, then design tests that are a series of clever little doors that can let through only minds like their own, thus giving them more evidence of “intelligence” and more examples of “intelligent people” and therefore more reason to devise additional tests of the same kind. More circular reasoning!
I think I might enjoy hanging out with the kinds of people who could get admitted to Mensa. But, I don’t think I’d ever want to spend any time with anybody who actually wanted to be in Mensa.
My rule of thumb is that anybody who talks about having a high IQ doesn’t.
–Isaac Asimov, “Thinking About Thinking”
I think I might enjoy hanging out with the kinds of people who could get admitted to Mensa. But, I don’t think I’d ever want to spend any time with anybody who actually wanted to be in Mensa.