🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 25 days agoAnon time travelssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down10
arrow-up18arrow-down1imageAnon time travelssh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 25 days agomessage-square7linkfedilink
minus-squareAlaknár@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·25 days agoIt’s already doing it. Steam data showed a 100% increase in Linux clients after a “one too many” Windows updates fucked something up last year. Note: it’s still hovering around the margin of error, but it’s strengthening. I think it went from 1.5% to 3%.
minus-squaretetris11@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·25 days ago Steam data showed a 100% increase in Linux clients dont… dont phrase sentences like this
minus-squareAlaknár@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·25 days agoWhy? It’s objective truth - it went from 1.5% to 3%, which is a 100% increase.
minus-squaretetris11@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·25 days agoI agree, but it buries the lede of the adoption only increasing by 1.5%. They could have written “doubled from X to Y” to at least prepare our expectations that it might not be a high increment
It’s already doing it. Steam data showed a 100% increase in Linux clients after a “one too many” Windows updates fucked something up last year.
Note: it’s still hovering around the margin of error, but it’s strengthening. I think it went from 1.5% to 3%.
dont… dont phrase sentences like this
Why? It’s objective truth - it went from 1.5% to 3%, which is a 100% increase.
I agree, but it buries the lede of the adoption only increasing by 1.5%. They could have written “doubled from X to Y” to at least prepare our expectations that it might not be a high increment