• Send Pics of Sandwiches@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because everyone thinks they’re just going to either explain what happened and it’ll all be fine (it won’t), or they think they can just weave a great big lie and the cops will buy it (they won’t). Don’t talk to the police without an attourney. If you’re in that chair, it’s because they want to implicate you in some way, regardless of right or wrong. While they might throw a fit about it, refusing to speak without an attourney present is your right and is in no way an admission of guilt.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      and the cops will buy it (they won’t).

      The vast majority of cops are really dumb, so I disagree with this statement. However, cops are highly motivated to not give a shit about whether a suspect is actually guilty. They’re motivated to get a confession or conviction, regardless of innocence or guilt.

      • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Assuming the cops are dumb (enough) is a really risky strategy. And even if you are lucky and they are, they might just end up making a lucky guess.

        Plus, they’ve been through this game hundreds of times, while you most likely have quite limited experience with the system (hopefully). Never underestimate that.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Assuming the cops are dumb (enough) is a really risky strategy.

          I am not saying to assume that they’re dumb. I’m saying to assume that they’re malicious

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That is a much safer assumption. Assume they are both malicious and smart. If they aren’t, you haven’t lost anything (except for the very small chance to get away with something, but if you rely on the cops being benevolent and/or dumb, maybe overthink your whole plan).

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              No. Assuming they’re smart isn’t necessary, nor is it realistic.

              All you need to assume is that they’re malicious. They are rewarded for fucking people over. That’s all that matters

              Now grow up and quit insisting on having the last word in the argument as if that makes you right

              • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Nice bait: do I take it, and therefore lose, or do I not, and therefore let you have the last word?

                Eh, we all know it. I am right, since I have the last word. I work at a pretty slow job, I have unlimited coffee and time, try me.