ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agoQuick, someone release Chatbot 2000!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square103linkfedilinkarrow-up1984arrow-down114
arrow-up1970arrow-down1imageQuick, someone release Chatbot 2000!lemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square103linkfedilink
minus-squareemergencyfood@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoThe only correct system is 0ver.
minus-squareFunkt4st1c@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-22 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarewyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoIMHO, the leading number should always be a fully distinct version from its preceding iterations. But, there are very few tech-fluent (much less capable) people pulling those levers, it seems.
The only correct system is 0ver.
deleted by creator
IMHO, the leading number should always be a fully distinct version from its preceding iterations. But, there are very few tech-fluent (much less capable) people pulling those levers, it seems.