ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agoQuick, someone release Chatbot 2000!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square104linkfedilinkarrow-up1984arrow-down114
arrow-up1970arrow-down1imageQuick, someone release Chatbot 2000!lemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square104linkfedilink
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoBecause it’s clearly not 1926 and it likely will not be around in 2126.
minus-squareteolan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-21 month agoMaybe the software will be around in 2126, but I most certainly won’t, not my problem 😂
minus-squareLycanGalen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoWhoa, you’re the first Lemmy ghost I’ve met 😉
minus-squareBaizey@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoMaybe it’s just the horror that we work with a very questionable version of it :( 263.2 2026 release, major 3, minor 2
minus-squareGoodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoType less numbers. Or one would name versions by their compilation timestamp. You wouldn’t want 20261002112036.
Why not just do 2026.10 then?
Because it’s clearly not 1926 and it likely will not be around in 2126.
Maybe the software will be around in 2126, but I most certainly won’t, not my problem 😂
Whoa, you’re the first Lemmy ghost I’ve met 😉
Oops
Maybe it’s just the horror that we work with a very questionable version of it :(
263.2
2026 release, major 3, minor 2
26.3.2 ?
No :(
Type less numbers. Or one would name versions by their compilation timestamp. You wouldn’t want 20261002112036.