If you were asked to pick the most annoying of the various Microsoft Windows interfaces that have appeared over the years, there’s a reasonable chance that Windows 8’s Metro start screen and interface design language would make it your choice. In 2012 the software company abandoned their tried-and-tested desktop whose roots extended back to Windows 95 in favor of the colorful blocks it had created for its line of music players and mobile phones.

Consumers weren’t impressed and it was quickly shelved in subsequent versions, but should you wish to revisit Metro you can now get the experience on Linux. [er-bharat] has created Win8DE, a shell for Wayland window managers that brings the Metro interface — or something very like it — to the open source operating system.

The most beautiful horror to ever exist lmao

  • Affidavit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is mean-spirited. Someone created something that they like and shared it with others, and people (who are clearly not the intended audience), are taking a big public dump on it.

    I didn’t like the Windows 8 start menu, but attacking someone who did like it and who is sharing how to experience the same thing on Linux, is pretty dickish IMO.

    • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s one of the aspects I like from Linux: The ability to make the desktop your own. And, like you, I’ll defend that preference and choice regardless of how terrible it is ;)

      Sometimes for no apparent reason I will reconfigure my desktop to look like an old OS (Workbench, MacOS, OS/2, Nextstep, etc…)

      • agentshags@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Workbench? How does one go about doing this, I’d love to feel like I was on an Amiga again lol

        e: also is there a way to make my shell look like the commodore 64 blue screen

        • massive_bereavement@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You will have to submit to XFCE, I have it as a spare when I feel nostalgic from my daily DE (KVM).

          Icons are… hard to accomplish:

          There are a couple of png libraries out there, so it is possible to recreate either the 3.5 or posterior looks, however the older workbench with its lovely drawers and different sized icons is something I haven’t achieved.

          You can still pick a modern DE, add png icons to the desktop and recreate something like this without the filesystem navigation (or prefs): magicWB

          (I found interesting the lower bar with the nextstep-like icons, though this was on 1994 so…)

      • Affidavit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s one of the aspects I like from Linux: The ability to make the desktop your own.

        100% this.

        Every time I try a new distro I spend 1-3 hours messing around with the settings, themes, and widgets to get things exactly the way I want it. This is why Linux rocks.

        I am not a developer, but I can only imagine how demotivating it would be if I were to put in the effort to develop a layout I like, share it with other people, and then encounter a post like this.

    • brian@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      no it doesn’t, you just have to add them for apps yourself. the readme has a whole section dedicated to live tiles.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The few people I know who had a Windows phone really liked the UI, the platform was just mismanaged by Microsoft. For example, they already had a problem with having too little apps in their store and then they broke app compatibility between Windows phone 7 and 8. I guess Google intentionally breaking compatibility of their services on Windows phones didn’t help adoption either.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          A bit ironic when Microsoft struggles because someone else keep breaking compatibility. Although I would prefer it to keep trying because that would have been more choice and competition in the mobile OS land