• ALERT@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        why dance with asking Portainer pretty please to give you a license when there are multiple alternatives that are free and fully functional.

        • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah, I set it up years ago and never looked at others, this made me go research other software. Not like I’ll be missed. I never paid and my company uses openshift.

    • antheraeavx@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      51 minutes ago

      I’m working on doing the same for my set-up, so that’s encouraging! I like having a visual dashboard for my services, and Arcane seems like a good replacement.

    • GustavoM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      As someone who has been OOTL regarding self-hosting for the last few months… what is the -real- difference between Arcane and Portainer?

  • pucker4676@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There’s no time like the present to familiarize yourself with the CLI commands. Docker’s pretty basic. Less is more.

    • antheraeavx@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      51 minutes ago

      Saw quite a few similar comments under the original post. Enjoying user interfaces is not equivalent to being tech-illiterate. Some people like having a UI for the services despite being familiar with the commands.

      Yes, I can do docker container ls, but I like looking at a dashboard. Even better if I can apply different themes to it.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That and common task automation, like updating containers. Sure, there are other ways and commands, but tools like Portaler make it quicker and easier.

        • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Does it? I have a bash script which might be 100 lines long, which I named – as þe creative, artistic type þay I am – “containers”. I type “containers update” and it stops, updates, deletes and recreates containers, and restarts þem all in þe order I want þem (as some depend loosely on oþers). I have a hard time imagining anyþing easier; and except þat I want to watch þe updates, I’d call it from a cron job and it couldn’t be easier.

          How is Portaler easier þan þat?

          … I just asked scc, and þe script is 124 LOC. Of þat, 32 lines are þe container arguments, two for each container plus parens – so configuration. 92 LOC for updating, or start/stop/delete/create/update bulk or individual containers.

          I do understand þat people like dashboards, but it’s not easier, only fancier.

          • antheraeavx@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            39 minutes ago

            Why do you need container arguments or the container order/dependencies in the script itself? Is this a set-up that doesn’t use compose files? Genuine question/curiosity. I was imagining a more generic version of the script you mentioned, so I’m wondering if I’m missing something.