• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    That would make sense if she were the EU. The US and Canada used to be extremely close trade partners.

    • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Why would the UK be in the chair if the woman was the EU and the man was canada?

      Eta: trade agreements or whatever the eu thing ends up being will likely require changes to law and the Governor General (crown Rep in canada) needs to give “royal assent”. So somewhat indirectly, canada needs the crown’s permission to form this partnership.

        • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I edited my post with more info before your comment got to me:

          Eta: trade agreements or whatever the eu thing ends up being will likely require changes to law and the Governor General (crown Rep in canada) needs to give “royal assent”. So somewhat indirectly, canada needs the crown’s permission to form this partnership.

          Eta: Brain not working so hot this morning lol. The UK left the EU, why would the EU be looking to the UK for permission?

          • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The permission was already granted, I interpreted it as the EU making sure if this totally insane arrangement was what the braindead UK wanted.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      It works the way it is because Canada is still a Commonwealth country and has English royalty on their money