I’m not stuck in time. I’ve embraced dependability.

  • Haley@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Older doesn’t necessarily mean worse. Dependability is important for sure.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It also doesn’t necessarily mean more dependable. There definitely is a fallacy problem that many fall into where they believe old = reliable.

      • ericwdhs@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That’s true, but if you have a 20-year-old item that is still working and a different 5-year-old item that is still working and you know nothing else about them, the statistics do work out that the former will likely maintain its working condition longer. It’s obviously not a hard rule, but as a rule of thumb, it exists for a reason.

      • Haley@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well if it is reliable, “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” is a good way of looking at it too. This is fair though!