• Initech_vs_Initrode@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 days ago

    While I definitely agree that the wealthy should be paying more in taxes, this isn’t an especially accurate take.

    1. There were way more deductions available. Basically, nobody ever paid any taxes at such a high rate.

    2. The primary reason for the post-war “golden age” that MAGA waxes nostalgia about is because almost the entire manufacturing sector of most European countries was wiped out. By comparison, the US was almost fully intact, and had a massive new base of workers trained in manufacturing. We went from a nation of farmers to a nation of city-dwelling industrialists almost overnight.

    I don’t see how we could ever get back to the 50s - 60s era of growth and security again, but overhauling taxation and more union representation could probably at least wind us back a few decades.

    • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The wealthiest person in America in the 1950s was JP Getty.

      His worth was about $1 billion. Which would equate to $13.86 billion today.

      1. There were way more deductions available. Basically, nobody ever paid any taxes at such a high rate.

      Ok, maybe, I’d be interested in seeing a source on this, but what qualified them for those deductions? Dumping huge sums of money back into the country and the community? There was a time the wealthy built libraries and parks and voluntarily gave some back.

      1. The primary reason for the post-war “golden age” that MAGA waxes nostalgia about is because almost the entire manufacturing sector of most European countries was wiped out. By comparison, the US was almost fully intact, and had a massive new base of workers trained in manufacturing. We went from a nation of farmers to a nation of city-dwelling industrialists almost overnight.

      Not at all accurate. Yes, much manufacturing has left because it’s cheaper to off shore it to developing nations, but America isn’t less prosperous now. That prosperity has just been consolidated to the top 1% more and more.

      • Initech_vs_Initrode@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Ok, maybe, I’d be interested in seeing a source on this

        It’s really easy to find if you actually wanted to verify, rather than just disingenuously cast doubt. Planet Money has done podcasts episodes on it.

        Not at all accurate

        Entirely accurate. We were the manufacturing center for much of the world until Europe was able to build back, which was badly hampered by foolish austerity measures. This is literally the reason why America had such a phenomenal post-war boom and an explosion of the middle class.

        but America isn’t less prosperous now. That prosperity has just been consolidated to the top 1%

        Gee, I wonder if that has anything to do with the loss of manufacturing jobs, disappearing union representation, and subsequent devaluation of labor?

        You’re identifying symptoms, not causes. Write less and read more.

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        They paved paradise and put up a parking lot.

        The popular 2002 cover, I mean, not the original 1970s release