• Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, if they’re not doing some other form of labour. I really feel like you might need to spend more time thinking on the meaning of the quote if you’re wasting time trying to find gotchas where things that can potentially be done just for pleasure are being turned into labour.

      • Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I went as far as reading it in original to make sure the meaning wasn’t lost in translation but my questions remain unanswered.

        The quote I think operates on assumption that there’s a direct correlation between time spent labouring and financial outcome. In capitalist world we have here, this correlation does not exist universally. it’s still possible to engage creatively, express yourself and be paid for it. Not for everyone, but still possible.

        • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          No, you definitely added that assumption yourself, it just talks about saving capital. You are assuming there is equal money to made in self expression as there is commercial execution.

          • Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Well yes, I’m trying to find some interpretation where the quote actually makes sense.

            No I’m arguing that the world is too large to make such assumptions universally, as demonstrated by objective reality.