• chewypoops@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    The audacity to ask for the raw, unprocessed photos for a lower price, and then complain that they look boring.

    You wanted the raws. Process them yourself.

    • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They were boring because of the lens choice and lack of effort/skill of the photographer. Processing isn’t going to do anything to change that.

    • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I mean this comment makes total sense if we pretend that all photos are equally valuable and that the color balance is the only issue but not if we actually address the part where the photographer ostensibly took a bunch of poorly framed candids and failed to capture the energy of the moment

      Oops, sorry, I forgot you already decided that the photographer must have been the good guy so that means I’m wrong

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The audacity to ask for the raw, unprocessed photos for a lower price, and then complain that they look boring.

      That has the same energy as going to a restaurant and asking for the raw ingredients.

      • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The craft I’m paying for is in the taking of the photos, processing is subjective and isn’t going to transform a shitty photo into a gorgeous one. Your restaurant comparison is shitty, it would only make sense if I was asking to just plate the food myself.