• cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t know where you think I implied it was ok for surface search, but it’s the exact opposite of what I wanted to say.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s a large list of things LLM are known to not be reliable for: searching anything beyond surface informations

      This implies that it is reliable for “surface informations” which i disagree with, though a lot of people get sucked in that way