cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/34598392
FBI Director Kash Patel said Monday that he had opened an investigation into the Signal group text chats that Minnesota residents are using to share information about federal immigration agents’ movements, launching a new front in the Trump administration’s conflict there with potential free speech implications.
Patel said in an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson that he wanted to know whether any Minnesota residents had put federal agents “in harm’s way” with activities such as sharing agents’ license plate numbers and locations.
But doesn’t Signal support disappearing messages? And end to end encryption? Meaning they’d need a recipient’s phone in order to see them at all. Although, now that I’m thinking it through in this context of a big group chat full of people you don’t/barely know, I can see the higher risk profile. So it’s bad in this circumstance, assuming messages are persistent.
Disappearing messages are a client side convention, they are not part of the protocol, they cannot be enforced. There are signal clients that never expire messages, screen capture, archive, etc
Yeah, I used to be in a group where I’m pretty sure a couple people were informants or agents. A couple people would fed-post in the Signal group sometimes.There were leaks that showed the FBI was indeed “monitoring” the group. I suspect any lefty group is infiltrated is some way.
Yes, and? It also supports screenshots.
Which is what they have.
I’m surprised screenshots are allowed in the app at all, that’s indeed pretty shit.
By default they’re not but I mean you could just pick up another camera and take a picture of the screen anyway, so you’re not really preventing anything by disabling it.
Right, so how do the other solutions solve this problem then? Kinda undercutting your own security argument with ways that NOTHING is actually secure.
As I’ve already explained, by allowing for multiple and anonymous accounts without a phone number requirement.
They can take all the screenshots they want but there’s nothing of value for them to target the participants.
Yeah, I guess that’s true - I was thinking about keeping the contents of the messages secure when I asked. But so long as you don’t give enough context to dox yourself, you’re right that at least individuals are not directly identifyable.