I just assume that every historical movie contains inaccuracies. Narrative reasons, budget constraints, dramatization, … I don’t always agree with the creative choices, but I understand why they do it and I’m not going to let it ruin my viewing experience. I can always jump into a wikipedia rabbit hole after the movie.
I can only think of one movie where they went too far for my tastes: the Hollywood movie where it’s USA soldiers who capture an intact enigma machine from a u boat.
That said, the danish military was involved in the mine clearing, only not in the way how it was depicted in the movie. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol22/iss1/4/ The actual pdf contains a better description of who did what than the abstract.
The movie is also partially incorrect, as Danish military wasn’t involved in the clearing, it was overseen by British officers.
I just assume that every historical movie contains inaccuracies. Narrative reasons, budget constraints, dramatization, … I don’t always agree with the creative choices, but I understand why they do it and I’m not going to let it ruin my viewing experience. I can always jump into a wikipedia rabbit hole after the movie.
I can only think of one movie where they went too far for my tastes: the Hollywood movie where it’s USA soldiers who capture an intact enigma machine from a u boat.
That said, the danish military was involved in the mine clearing, only not in the way how it was depicted in the movie. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol22/iss1/4/ The actual pdf contains a better description of who did what than the abstract.