• i_love_FFT@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah, but these systems also act as corruption-prevention mechanisms.

    They’re more like fault tolerant computations: if both bodies don’t agree on something, then that something must be flawed and should not be applied.

    With only one democratic body, it might be faster to pass laws, but they would all be quite flawed because they would lack peer-review from an independent body…

    In practice, its the two-party-only system and fptp that screws things up.

    • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      The electoral college is more of a equality-prevention mechanism. One vote in rural america, racist america if you will, is equal to ten in a city.

      • WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        At the same time it was necessary for the federalization to happen in the first place. States wouldn’t sign up if there wasn’t an equal vote per state. It’s like the European Council - you probably wouldn’t get Slovenia to sign up to the EU, if Slovenia got half a vote while Germany got fifty votes. But if the EU progresses farther down the federalization path it will face the same thing where the states become less important and equal representation per state becomes stupid.

        Tough problems, man.