• Calfpupa [she/her]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    That totally ignores what the goals of the USSR were: ending capitalism while being a transition to communism. This is literally “don’t let perfection be the enemy of the good situation.” Capitalisms power needs to be crushed before any extreme leftward movement can happen, otherwise you just get color revolutions and CIA-ops forever. It seems like you believe that the “international solidarity” that the USSR was building was imperialism, and if that’s the case, how would international solidarity look different as it slowly spread across the globe?

    • therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      the goals of the USSR were: ending capitalism

      Is that what their goals were? Really?

      They sure had a strange way of showing it… you know, crushing anything that was too socialist and radical for their reactionary tastes.

    • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      I am making no critiques of the USSR in this statement. I am critiquing an approach I see leftists take with modern colonial-imperialist regimes that aren’t the United States today. If I want to overthrow the imperial powers of today, I have to do so by helping the people resisting their oppressors where ever they are, even if their oppressors oppose my oppressors. The people can only ever free themselves, they can never be freed by an external force. If I am going to call myself anti-imperial, I am going to act and speak in support of people resisting oppression be that a genocide in Latin America, Sudan, the Congo, or Palestine.